Zionism, stable purposes, variable tools

Ten Commandments of Zionist movement (10)
In nine episodes before, the process of formation and structure of the Zionist movement was criticized and looked in from the wing Congress in 1897 until the present, and now, in the last episode or as the last command of the ten commandments of Zionism, we will examine the practical means.
Zionist leaders did not specify the type of tools used to achieve the movement's goals in their rules and it depends on the time, location and facilities of each period, namely in terms of enforcement discretion. In this section we mention the important parts:
1. There is no means that can be used always and in all circumstances equally. But reason dictates that humans based on priority, time and location of each course, take advantage of various tools and techniques. Because the tools that are useful today may be harmful tomorrow, or at least does not have the necessary impact. An experienced commander is one who knows when, where and how to deploy his gun and a political wise leader in the same way should use the appropriate tools taking into account the terms and conditions of their facilities and others.
So diversity of tool is a natural in the hands of decision makers, and if anyone always uses the same tool and is unaware of other tools, has committed a grave error, because tool serves the purpose and purpose does not serve the tool and continuous use of one tool or method, reveals the agent for the competitors and lead to infertility its activities in the long term.
2. Each device is legal and application of the law and ethics in using tools id meaningless. there is no good and bad means and evil and honesty in the world and also a good way is the one that end to victory and a bad way is that one which cause failure, even it is very ethical and admirable; this means that if faulty instruments are successful for a bad purpose, is far better than a good tool for any good purpose to fail!
Success is the best measure of performance of tools not for ethical issues. This is the principle many philosophers and political thinkers believe in human history which says purpose justifies the means. And perhaps no one like the Zionists of Israel has not followed the idea in the last hundred and three thousand years ago, and applied as against the Palestinian people.
We noted once again that in order to prove evidence of our writings we used remain Jews' book of Zion Protocols of the wise men. As their obscenity and indecency is self-exposure of their nature of Jews in the first and second millennium before Christ (Peace be upon him).
3. The gradation of what we today call the staging is highly appropriate and necessary approach to achieve the goals so they do not be obstacle in the next steps.
That's why the Zionists assumed it better that in implementing orders of ancestors, they use this method. E.g. in Palestine occupation they just want a foothold in any part of the earth initially with humanitarian rhetoric. Then with the introduction of its religious history they elected Palestine as the foothold, and then they demanded a part of Palestine for the Jewish people, later they asked for the formation of a Jewish state in Palestine over the soil and eventually they claimed the protection of the existence of the Jews regime in Palestine attacked surrounding nations.
The important thing is that a program no matter how small and seemingly undervalued it is, it does not have inconsistencies with the original program and it cannot be considered as retreat from the position because each plan must be considered accountable and we must move forward. Only in case of withdrawal from the mainstream even in the case of some achievements, failures come to the anchors. The balance and not blindly movements lead to the success and goals.
Unfortunately, in the case of Palestine, many Arabs deliberately or naively and ignorance confirmed the peace process and even defend it because the false reason that to achieve the final victory they must enter from subsidiary.
Of course, if the liberation of Palestine leads to the complete liberation of all occupied territories, we never opposed it and we will not call it compromise, but the liberation of a part of Palestine and relying on it as a bargaining chip is an illusion that takes us to the mirage and is a waiver of the right of the Palestinian people.
If we did not know that the Zionists during the last century did not back down even an inch of Palestinian soil, perhaps we could just understand the theory. But time proved to everyone that Zionism created autonomous organization's previous achievements and the underlying balances put your next achievements.
So what we are proud of as achievement of peace is actually ignoring the enormous wealth for gaining Black monetary that worth noting in the market.
4. Goals, appointments, contacts and relations should be hidden as much as possible and no one should be aware of them. Otherwise, the Zionists are bound to implement the commitments that have no desire to do it. So they delay the other side so they do not understand the case.
To do it, Zionists (since Herzl so far) have made wordplay as an integral part of relationships and contacts with various state, government and groups. For example, in the Congress Wing, about 250 famous Jews characters were there, and the audience after hours of debate surrounding their legal status and legal regime in Palestine, reached the conclusion that term of state hurts Zionism process. So by removing the term, the term Kaman Wealth was chose instead that is too vague and complex term.
There is no doubt that they learnt the method from English who are masters of fallacy. Since English people fooled Palestinians with the same terms and expressions for fifty years, 1915 to 1967. Our point is Makmahun- Hussein correspondence about the fate of the Palestinians in the framework of an Arabic area in West Asia and its future after the First World War and Resolution 242 of the United Nations after the 1967 Arab-Israeli war, on the back withdrawal of Israeli armed forces from territories occupied by the Arabs.
Yes, more than eighty years past after the letter writing and thirty years have passed from the resolution, but in both of them they have played with words so much that the Arabs still do not understand its meaning because all the terms were in favor of the Zionists, but they have been taken into account of Arabs.
However, in recent years since the Madrid Conference, the Treaty of Hebron and other peace negotiations that are now underway, were Zionists' student of fallacy who was even stronger than English professor, and it used so various and contradictory wordings in contract that confused all people.
Unfortunately Arabic - Palestinians negotiators are not a good student of history. That's why they make mistakes constantly and pay the price for this mistake by signing the contract. As if they do not know what is Zionists' purpose and aim of all this contact and dialogue with the Arabs.
5. Zionists' tool to achieve their goals is always like a coin that has two faces. With this method they are always successful, and it does not matter which side appears.
Zionists message to everyone that they are only with them and not with others, they are friends, with the Conservative and Labor parties, with Republicans and Democrats in America, the Gaullist and the French socialists, with the right and left parties of the world, with countries of the North and the south, colonial African countries, racism and opponents, with war and peace, with capitalism and communism, with believers and atheists, with white and black, with workers and employers, with Britain first forty years of the century, and the enemies of England in the second forty years and briefly with everyone that they have an interest in.
Herzl was one of those who implemented this process in every detail. He first wrote to European official to encourage him to internationally support the establishment of a Jewish state in Palestine licensing encouragement and promised him that if he cooperates, full-features of global movement of Zionism and the new government and world Jewish people will serve him and the new state will turn into a fixed base for financial, military, strategic, political, economic and international issues of that country. Then, he made this promises to other European official and former rival, as well as to other authorities in Europe. He promised to anyone that he is ready to be conspiring with him against another. As if he was not afraid of exposing the game and deceiving.
In his opinion, even if Herzl was questioned, he would coolly reply: this is career secret and character of attitude of an Israeli with others!
As the saying goes: neither his friendship is permanent, nor his enemies; only his interest is permanent.
Herzl always believed that we should stand firmly and not just promises because certainty is detrimental to the efforts of Zionism. So in 1897, while he made plans for full occupation of Palestine, he spoke of little footstep to save downtrodden Jews.
His successors took the same way as well so that Wiseman called for a Jewish state in Palestine twenty years after the Balfour Declaration, while the desire to Palestinian development around the Arab world had engaged the mind of Wiseman, and all Zionists.
Thirty years after Balfour, Ben-Gurion urged the United Nations to issue a license to create a Jewish state in half of Palestine, while he was preparing conspiracy for the other half.
And twenty years after the incident, the Israeli army occupied all of Palestinian land and provided the groundwork for complete domination of the Jewish people over Arabic Land.
This trend has continued to the present time and Rabin, Peres and Netanyahu each have satisfied Palestinian - Arabic parties that in exchange for big gains, they will sit back a bit from their stance, and they accepted it as well and they went back so much that not they have to largely withdrawn for small gains.
Yes, Israel is like a predator with sharp teeth that tears everything and expands his territory as much as possible. That is until they have power. However the predator attitude is not instantaneous and fleeting, but it is accurate and planned feature that will remain in it forever.
We only discussed stable commands and principles of Zionism in the essays and we reviewed them because principles are always constant but tools are variable; principles that are nothing in lexicon of Zionist but changing tools as needed but keeping the basic rules of the game.