Will human actions and behaviors not be questioned on the Day of Judgment

Note: nearly a quarter century ago in the city of Tabriz a book called "the interpretation of difficult verses of the Quran" by Mr. "Yousefi slogan" was released. The author of the book without adhering to the principles and rules of interpretation explained a series of revelations and therefore experienced unforgivable blames. These series of articles criticizing the author's comments.
(Verse) we on the doomsday will question those who sent them the messengers as well as the prophets themselves". In the elementary and superficial view, sometimes people think that there are some differences between some verses in the interpretation as some imply that no one can not intervene while some imply that some can intercede who are from the God and can intervene on that day. The Commentators spoke extensively about these verses and have resolved their primitive differences. One of them concerned with the question and responses of the people on the doomsday so here are some verses which clearly signify that in this day there are questions and responses as God says: on the Day of Judgment people will be questioned and the same theme verses say : " swear to God people will be questioned , all. (Another verse on this theme) {God says} "Stop them; they will be questioned as well as other verses sent down that you can freely study them. All and all of the verses indicate that on the Day of Judgment they will be asked. However, opposite to these groups of verses, there are some verses that reject the issue of questioning the human and jinn and says : about the criminal sin will not be asked and in Surah of Al-Rahman Quran says : on this day the sin of the criminal will not be questioned . the cementers have views concerning the concepts of these verses that the writer has chosen one of them and aims to prove it with evidence so, he says: The meaning of the verses that say on the Day of Judgment people are interrogated, is that they are asked whether a Prophet came or not and the aim of the question is the same mission of "the prophet" and "warning". So, the purpose of the verses that negate questioning is that we do not ask them one by one which action they have been committed and there is no need that on the Day of Judgment we question them one by one whether they have committed that sin or not?
Evidence that questioning is the same coming of the Prophet is verse 8 and 9 of Chapter MOLK, where it says: Whenever a group of the pagans are put in the fire, the hell administrators ask them whether "an Warner " did not come to you? And this leads to the question that the same question that on the Judgment Day is asked, is about coming of the prophets and the aim of the verses which indicate that on the doomsday there is no question is that on that Day no question will be asked of the sinners individually about their sins and the answer of such a judge is rejected in terms of some aspects; Firstly disagrees with the Qur'an's verses, because there are verses clearly implies that the individual will be questioned one by one, and their deeds will be interrogated them: As it says: (verse) " of course, on the Day of Judgment will be asked about what you were doing. " Of course on that day of the lies and slander that they committed will be questioned". These verses and other verses clearly indicate that Judgment Day will be asked of what anyone committed – unfortunately ,the author of the interpretation writes "about the sins of persons will not be asked individually so, the only thing that is questioned is that whether prophet revelations have come to you Or not? .
The author of the interpreter has noticed this problem and on the footers regarded to the interpretation of some of these verses and writes: The purpose of the question in the above verse is that people before us concerning the actions they have committed will be accountable, and of course we will punish them. This interpretation is not empty of any problem. The purpose of the question in this verse " all of you will be questioned, if knew" is that people are held accountable concerning what have done but, we will punish them and of course we will punish them. So, this interpretation is not bare of the likely error because, firstly, under any condition , in Arabic language the sentence of " surely questioning" is not used as sentencing but, this meaning is understood that all of them will be questioned and in short, whenever the goal of " being accountable ' is that people are questioned individually , in this case, the difference between verses have not been solved and if the purpose is that only the committer of the actions will experienced then, clearly this issue is against the tradition and is used in Arabic language when questioning not pronouncing one as responsible or accountable. Secondly, the verses which indicate that people on the Day of Judgment are interrogated, the purpose is before interring into the hell and before feeling of actions but, the verse which implies that the administrators of the hell ask the sinners whether a prophet has come to you. However, it is when the judgment has come over and the questioning has been ended and everything finished and it is in the situation that when they are thrown toward the hell, the hell guards say as disagreement if any prophet comes to you? Therefore, using the verses concerning the question that relates to a pre- judgment is something quite unrelated and everything is separate from the other one. Thirdly: If we reason the successive narratives and after proofing them we begin to act, in such case, we must say: denying of the question and specifying it to the keepers of Hell that if any prophet has come with the narration of deceive that entered about doomsday is quite the opposite and this comment despite the fact that is not compatible with the other verses is quite the opposite of what has come in other narrations. How the conscience of the informed commentators is aware that (by asserting of blessing of God and questioning about the way of spending them) will be asked is to say that the purpose of all these verses is the same question of hell guards and it is when the sinners are put in the hell and questioned whether a prophet has come to you or not and when the question of the guards are asked in mocking and never will be waiting to answer while the verses of the second group show that their question will be real and the questioner will be waiting for answer. Clearly says: The purpose of the question is not true Call of God because the God and the operators are aware of the fact but - nevertheless - the purpose is confess and admit and not mocking and there is an obvious difference between these two.
Our view: we here do not have specific comments because Islam scientists and particularly Shia leaders have spoken words that we have sufficient explanation of every aspect
1- A man asked Imam Ali (PBUH) on the difference between the verses at issue, Imam said on the last day of revelations the agreed human and difference of the verses is also in concord and may be some end without question.
2- The mentioned gathering was mentioned by some literates and has chosen it. When it says the purpose is a question that its aim is inquiries and the call. Because the human God is aware and does not need to question and, therefore, immediately after the rejection of the question says: Because the human God is aware and does not need to question and, therefore, immediately after the rejection of the question says " the criminals are known by their figures" and the purpose is the question that its aim is to confess.
3- The verses that negates questioning, the purpose of questioning and response is by tongue while the opposite verse that includes questioning is questioning through the body organs and the below verse evidences this issue.
"Today we stamp on their tongues and their hands speak to Us, and their feet testify to their deeds "