SHAROUSI SHAMASI (doubtful hadith)

Recently, a video has been released by a person names as HASAN ALLAHYARI, trying to put the credibility of Islamic revolution under a question, he brought a HADITH, called "SHAROUSI SHAMASI" which is claimed to be of ALI EBN ABITALEB. Verifying about this matter is the duty of experts and researchers of Islamic hadith, so some students of HOZE ELMIYEH (religious school) visited a mentor, asking for guidance.one of the religious masters by name, HOJATOLESLAM HASANZADEH LAILE KOUHI has mentioned his opinions, but first we shall have a look on ALLAHYARI's claim, since the original video is about an hour and a half and not all the readers might get the chance to watch it.

1. SHAROUSI SHAMASI, claimed to be heretic in the mentioned hadith, is the same person as Imam Khomeini! )we seek refuge in Allah(
2. He will claim to be Imam.
3. He will declare adultery to be legal.
4. Exits from KHORASAN.
5. He will dispel Pahlavi religion.
6. He is sinful liar.
7. He will try to establish a republic government

The following are the points mentioned by HASANZADEH LAILE KOUHI:
He claims the hadith to be consisting of two parts:
1-From SULAYM EBN QAYS HELALI, from HADHIFAH YAMANI from SALMAN from AMIRE MOMENAN
From ZARE, from Mohammad EBN MUSLIM from Imam SADEGH from ALI EBN ABITALEB. What should be mentioned here is that this hadith is of MARFU type, meaning not every narrator in the long chain of narrations to the imam is known and so it is not completely acceptable. On the other hand the other way mentions SULAYM EBN QEYS to be the last narrator in the chain (meaning he is the closest to the modern era) while SULAYMAN EBN QEYS is available and the information attributed to him must have been mentioned in his book supposing it was really related to him.
2. The book which he names it as his source of research is ELZAM ALNASEB by ASTARABADI, but, we couldn't find such book despite all our efforts.
Yes, this ELZAM ALNASEB book is in fact written by ayatollah HAERI YAZD and everyone can easily find it through libraries and the internet. However, it looks as if by ELZAM ALNASEB, he actually means ANSAB ALNAVASEB and apparently the name of the book has been misspelled!
3. Maybe he was having ANSAB ALNAVASEB in his mind, it's worth mentioning that the writer of this book lived in 11th century which we have to say the fact that, there is a time gap of several centuries between Mr. ASTARABADI, ZARARE or SULAYM EBN QEYS!! And so the chain of narrators by whom the Hadith has been narrated to ASTARABADI is to be found.

 

4-He claims that SHAROUSI SHAMASI will exit from KHORASAN while Imam Khomeini was from KHOMEIN and ignited the revolution from Qum and certainly not KHORASAN.
5. Another part of his claims suggests: SHAROUSI SHAMASI is of Indian SIKH's descendants while Imam Khomeini's ancestry is completely clear and such claims are by no means true.
according to the ancestry research done by HESHMATOLLAH RIYAZI YAZDI, which is brought up as the last part of ayatollah PASANDIDEH`s diary, imam Khomeini's thirteenth ancestor was named SEYYIED HEYDAR MOUSAVI SAFAVI ARDEBILI KURDI, who was SEYED from both his mother and father side, traveled to Kashmir(north India) in 766, followed by an invitation from SEYD ALI HAMEDANI with missionary purposes.
And some of them were martyrs in this path until SEYED Ahmad, Imam's grandfather who went to Hajj and then to Najaf and from there he came to Iran and KHOMEIN city. If supposing migration could change one's nationality, then Mr. ALLAHYARI himself must be American and of Abraham Lincoln descendants, since he has been living in the U.S for several years!

6-It's mentioned in the text which he was reading that, SHAROUSI SHAMASI will destroy Pahlavi religion, while neither king claimed that his government is based on religion nor Imam Khomeini destroyed Pahlavi`s religion. Imam's decision, was to destroy Pahlavi dynasty not the religion!
7-He mentions elsewhere that SHAROUSI SHAMASI will claim republic government, while if one has the least knowledge of terminology subjects, they would know the word "JOMHURI", is an Arabic word for republic as the meaning, didn't indicate democracy or any of the meanings the word carries nowadays.
8- It can be noticed with little attention that Mr. ALLAHYARI pretends to read from a book, while he turns some A4 papers ever time. So he's actually reading from those papers and not the book, he's in fact using the trick of reading from the book to influence the audience so that they don't doubt the credibility of his claims.
9-The camera`s angle is fixed in a way that only one side of the book can be seen, so that the audience can`t distinguish whether he's reading from a book or something of another format. If Mr. ALLAHYARI is actually is certain about his documents then why wouldn't he show the book to the viewers to make them believe, especially when he shows the book's texts numerous times to make the viewer believe it?
10. He claims the DAJALIAS, (a term he uses for Shia revolutionist), have destroyed SHAMASI hadith while any sane person can easily understand such things are not possible. This is because religious texts are printed in different parts of the world and specifically in Lebanon and Egypt, and not Iran. So Islamic republic of Iran is not able to buy all the books from all over the world to stop the spread of this hadith. This claim will sound funny to any sane person.
By the way, the book ANSAB ALNAVASEB which he claims to be containing the hadith, is being kept both in ASTAN Quds RAZAVI library and AMIRUL MOMENIN library in Najaf. So maybe the DAJALIA have forgotten to remove the book from those libraries. The book can also be found and downloaded online.
11. Mr. ALLAHYARI claims SHAROUSI SHAMASI will claim to be Imam. This is in contrast to the fact that Imam Khomeini never claimed to be Imam and is quoted to be saying: calling me a servant of the nation, sounds more appealing than a leader. And he was always tough to those persons, admiring him without no reason. The word Imam was first used by Dr. RUHANI, for the first time.
12. There is mentioned elsewhere that SHAROUSI SHAMASI is the sinful liar - AFAK ATHIM- and so he calls Imam Khomeini sinful liar, this is in contrast to the fact that none of Imams closed ones never saw him telling lie or talking behind someone's back or doing any kind of injustice.
13. What is very disappointing about Mr. ALLAHYARI claims is that he introduces SHAROUSI SHAMASI as someone who declares adultery to be legal! The question is, can Imam Khomeini's worst enemies able to attribute this to him? The history of revolution and leadership is completely transparent. Did something like that ever happened during or after the revolution?

Putting these all together will create a strong guess that, the said hadith is doubtful and has serious problems, although we're still researching about it and we ask Mr. ALLAHYARI to introduce any valid document, he might have to prove it.
At the end we shall ask dear readers to ask for valid evidence when they hear any hadith from anyone, so that, anyone does not allow himself to write or say whatever they wish, to our holy prophet or holy fourteen infallibles.