Zionist Lobby in the United States of America

In 1954 John Foster Dallas, the former minister of foreign affairs in the Unites States, had complained with some of his friends: I have learned it from experience that it is almost impossible to take a definite standing towards Middle East in this country without the consent of Jews. George Marshall, the former minister of foreign affairs, and James Forestall, the former minister of defense, have also had the same opinions.
He added:
I am extremely concerned about this fact, Jewish influence here on this scene is dominant, and because of this influence, the Congress cannot do anything that is not in approved by Jews. Embassy of Israel dictates to the congress whatever it wants, through influential Jews.
Dulles used to complain about the penetration and domination of Jews over his administrative system of his country when the sun of the domination of the Zionist state on the United States had not risen, and only six years have passed since the establishment of Israel and what he referred to was the results of that magic domination!
Even before Dulles, Truman, that time president of the United States of America (1945- 1953) in a conversation with some of the diplomats on the subject of the influence of the Zionist pressure groups and the influence of the Jewish vote, had said:
Gentlemen! Excuse me, I have to satisfy the needs of hundreds of thousands of people who are waiting for the success of Zionism, but among voters, thousands of Arabs can never be found.
The fact is that today the Jewish domination over the United States is much broader and deeper than before. During the last half century with their integrated and finely planned programs, while penetrating into the most sensitive political and economic businesses and getting the control of the media and dominating the executive and legislative branches of government, are the strongest and most influential pressure groups in the United States, so that in a word, we can say: six million Jews decide for 260 million US citizens.
Presidents of the United States of America, since years before the beginning of World War II till today, i.e. from Roosevelt to Truman and Eisenhower, then Kennedy, Johnson, Nixon, and his successor, Ford and then Carter, Reagan, Bush, Clinton and finally George W. Bush have all been under the pressures of American Jewish lobbies and have been in the service and obedience of Zionists. But here it is appropriate to take a short break on the influence of the Jewish lobby of America on Bill Clinton, former president, on whom they imposed their control and then removed the most executive and prominent figures from politics and turned to the principle of "America’s unconditional economic assistance to Jews" and under great pressure appointed many of their fellow people in key positions in the government.
If finance minister of the United States at the time of Roosevelt and foreign minister and national security adviser in the Nixon’s government were Jewish, and if the Jews in the Reagan era had penetrated into the most important executive jobs in the United States Department of State and Defense and the Central Intelligence Agency and the economy institutions of science, commerce, agriculture, and others were in his possession, domination of Jews in the Clinton era the vast areas of the United States, overshadowed. Secretary of State, Secretary of Defense, National Security Advisor, Minister of Economy and America's ambassador in Israel were even.
This led Zionists to grant the highest epithets to Clinton. An Israeli newspaper wrote an article and called him "the best Zionists".
Clinton since the beginning of his presidency in 1992 until the re-election in 1995, appointed Jews in positions in the White House that from the plurality of them, it was said at the White House in Washington the Hebrew language is used rather than English language.
Usually every day at six in the morning, some of the officials of intelligence America (CIA) were gathered at the White House and submitted their daily reports to the president and four senior White House officials. These reports, which during the last 24 hours had been collected by the CIA spy satellites and a network of worldwide procurement and contained accurate information about the latest events in the world, were heard by the president and high-ranking officials. The officials in the Clinton years were: Al Gore (Vice President), Anthony Lake (National Security Advisor of Al Gore), Lyon Bantya (White House chief of civil administration), Samuel Berger (deputy national security adviser), and Brett Lyon (adviser to Vice President on national security).
The latter two, i.e. the Samuel Berger and Brett Lyons, were Jewish.
On the other hand, seven of eleven senior members of the National Security Committee of the United States of America were also Jewish.
According to David Steiner, chairman of the Israeli Public Affairs Committee in the United States (AIPAC), the committee during the campaign in 1991, collected 63 million dollars grant from American Jews, rushed to help Bill Clinton with the result that he won the rivalry against Bush.
Conversely services that Clinton granted only in the first year of his presidency to the Jewish residents of the United States were much more than their expectations. Political observers at the time believed that relations between the United States and Israel was on the eve of the new development soon the United States turn from a partner and an ally of Israel to an absolute follower of policies of the Zionist leaders.
Clinton's first tribute to the Jews in the United States was gathering a large number of them in the White House and appointing them in the highest executive and governmental positions. Only in the Department of State, seven of the highest and most sensitive jobs in the area were occupied by the Zionists, the most prominent of whom was Dennis Ross, who as an American member of the coordinator of the US peace talks in Arabic countries was influential and tried to convince Arab states to comply with the wishes and requirements of Israel with humility and obedience.
In this situation, Clinton, for selecting and appointing authorities of each country needed the approval and consent of the Jewish lobby in the United States.
In this case, the appointment of a successor to Lice Aspen that time Secretary of Defense in the United States and the many controversial launched by Jewish pressure groups, needs thorough thought. Contemplation in this case could set aside a corner of the veil of ambiguity and uncertainty and show the depth of the Jewish lobby in the United States.
Yitzhak Rabin, the former Israeli prime minister, in March 1993, while visiting Washington, strongly urged Clinton to release Jonathan Pollard, the Israeli spy, from prison but Clinton failed to comply with these demands.
Weinberger, Secretary of Defense of the United States has said about Pollard: "The volume of confidential information and confidential documents that Pollard has moved from America to Israel is so dense and vast that they cannot be eliminated."
Political observers said that the release of Pollard was among the promises that the Jews had taken from Clinton before the presidential election, but after stepping into the White House he realized that such a commitment is not easily possible due to the Pentagon stubborn stance.
Anyway, when Clinton asked quite serious from Aspen Lice, his former defense minister, to take into consideration the release of Pollard, Aspen resigned in order to get rid of the shame of this scandal.
Following the resignation, in June 1994, Bobby Inman was introduced by Clinton as secretary of Defense to the Congress.
With the announcement, the press in the United States congratulated him, but suddenly a wave of controversy and opposition from the Zionists against Inman got up and influential Zionist press triangle in the United States of America, William Safer and Anthony Lewis in "The New York Times," and Goldman in " Boston Gallup" began hard attacks against this choice and following it all the press which were under the influence of Zionism provoked the opposition.
The main reason for the protest was that in 1981, when Inman was the Deputy of CIA and was responsible for America's national security, had objected to the use of warplanes nuclear reactor by Israeli warplanes.
After withdrawal from office of the Ministry of Defense, Inman said in a press release: When Israel attacked Iraq's nuclear reactors, I considered the distance between Israel and Baghdad and the question occurred to me that how Israel collected such information to do this action and which sourced they used?
After doing required investigations, it was found that during the six months prior to the operation, Israel regularly obtained images even from distant countries like Pakistan and Libya, through American satellites. In other words, William Casey, that time head of the CIA organization, had news-fed Israelis more than necessary.
Inman in terms of office of America's national security, enacted laws that prevented Israel’s widespread access to images and information from America's spy satellites. It was permissible to use such information only in self-defense.
Inman decisions provoked the anger of Israeli defense minister, Ariel Sharon which led him to talk with Weinberger, Secretary of Defense of the United States of America in this case, but when Sharon understood that the question does not interest Weinberger and he approves of his assistant decision, provoked Jonathan Pollard considered by Israeli authorities as the greatest spies in the history of the Jewish state, to carry out this critical and serious mission. Pollard, in his ten-year extraordinary espionage mission in the United States, succeeded to transfer America’s most hidden and accurate military secrets to Israel.
With this description, we can see why Yitzhak Rabin in his talks with Clinton, had repeatedly emphasized on the freedom of Pollard.
However, Sharon could not forget Bobby Inman’s position in 1981 against Israel. Therefore with his provocations, the Jewish lobby in the United States began widespread attack against Inman, as Secretary of Defense of the United States of America.
These events illustrate the depth of the penetration and influence of the Zionist Jews in the United States of America and for this reason many American politicians always ask: "Who is really ruling over the United States of America and key posts in the country are at whose hands?”. Some other like American intellectual author, Ms. Yvonne Haddad says:
The White House is occupied only by the Jews ... in a way that we Americans say the Occupied White House.
The White House is not only in the coil of Jewish domination, the Congress and the Senate are also under the control of Zionists.
Dr. Israel Shahak, professor of chemistry at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, while issuing a statement titled "bomb" has stated that:
America's Jewish lobby has managed through bribery, intimidation and blackmail to attract the consents of at least seventy member of the Senate thereby strengthening its foundations in the United States.
These representatives are required to veto the decisions that will be taken by the White House and conflict with the interests of Israel.
On the other hand, the undisputed dominance of the Jews in the mass media of the United States is so much and widespread that criticizing them is impossible and if someone takes steps in this field, will be immediately accused of anti-Semitism, and is condemned to racism. It seems that the Jews themselves are not racist.
American veteran politician, Paul Findley, in a book titled as “Who dares to talk about it” also discusses the Zionist lobby group and their influence and dominance: "This branch of the Israeli government, the Congress and the Senate and the presidential administration and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Department of Defense (Pentagon) and mass media and even schools and churches dominate and influence.”
Obviously, Jew’s pressure and interference in the administrative system of the United States of America creates doubt for the country's politicians regarding the United States interests and independence in decision-making. As Donald McHenry career diplomat and representative of the United States of America to the United Nations during the Carter had stated: "... due to the influence of pro-Israel lobby groups, the government of America will not be able to pursue its national interests in the Middle East."
Senator G. William Willbrant, chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee of America, also on 28/4/1960 stated with regret that "180 million Americans are seeing how the foreign policy of their country is administered by a small minority that has a strong pressure group”.
This senator, on the fifteenth of April 1973, in a television program broadcasted in CBS channel, said:
"Senate of America is dominated by Israel."
Saying this sentence turned him from the best known and most prominent political figures in Arkansas and the one always praised by Jews as a hero for many years and whose star could shine across American policy, suddenly lost the chance and Zionist propaganda machine was used against him and in the next election he was replaced by Dale Bumbers, a pro-Israel senator.
These retaliatory behavior and adverse consequences led politicians of the United States of America to refrain from talking about the domination of Zionists on the administrative system of the United States and refused to uncover many facts for the sake of their political and social position.
At the same time, in the statements of many politicians in the country, more or less, the fact is mentioned.
In 1990, American conservative politicians, Patrick Biocanen stated:
"Congress of America is among the occupied territories of Israel."
But perhaps the most articulate expression in the influence of the Zionist lobby in American Congress was the ironic expression of George Ball, former Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs who has said:
When it comes to Middle East policy, Congressmen act like a bunch of puppies, and go up and down in circle created by the pro-Israel pressure groups.
What Paul Findley states quoting Admiral Thomas Moor who was America's Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff during the war of 1973 between the Arabs and Israel in the book “They dare to speak candidly”, shows the authority of Zionists on the United States House of Representatives from another angle.
Maurer said during the 1973 war, the Mordecai Gur man, military attaché of the Embassy of Israel in America, which later became Chief of Staff of the armed forces of Israel, requested me to equip Israel with air-to-ground anti-tank missile aircrafts called “Ritmak”.
Maurer says, immediately rejected the demand, he said, can not comply with such demands because we have only one squadron (Fujian) from the aircraft more and we're still trying to convince Congress that the United States needs this aircraft , and if the aircraft is at your disposal, on the Day of Resurrection will be the Congress.
Mordecai said with confidence and composure, "You give us the planes and responsibility of Congress will be up to me."
Maurer adds with great regret, "... and it was so; and the only aircraft equipped with anti-tank missiles, was delivered to Israel."
General George Brown, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff of the United States in 1974 in a speech to “Duke” university students discussed Jewish domination of American government and the media and discussed the country's economy and openly declared:
Israelis come to us to get the military facilities. But when we say without the consent of Congress we cannot comply with your request, they respond: "You do not worry; leave the consent of Congress to us."
He mixed the bitter and angry tone said they belong to the alien land: but in our country of such authority. They are, as you know, the banks and the press of this country.
Without it would be useful here to note that even the United Nations and the UN Security Council, and before that, the League of Nations outside the sphere of influence is not the Zionists.
After World War I, by virtue of the Treaty of Versailles, the League of Nations was established to provide world peace, but the beginning of its establishment, it was evident the presence of Jews in sensitive posts.
Israel Zangoil, famous Zionist, in the early decades of the previous century, said:
"This community (League of Nations) is in fact the Embassy of Israel." Lord Alfred Douglas believed that "the League of Nations will soon become the central station of Jewish government to control the world".
On the other hand, Nahum Sokolov, one of the leaders of the Zionist movement, on August 27, 1922 in the conference "Karsbad" announced: the plan to establish the League of Nations, was a Jewish idea that after 25 years of efforts we have achieved it.
In the same way, in the Security Council of the United Nations, regardless of vetoing all resolutions in conflict with the interests of the Zionist regime by the United States, the Zionist lobby in the country, with different tools and methods leaves an effect on the performance and decisions of this the organization. The following examples are just a few cases:
One of the active Zionist lobbies in the United States is the "National Christian Leadership Council, in favor of Israel" established by Professor Franklin Litle, a famous and scientific figure of Timble University in New York, in early 1980.
The organization, during the eighties, focused its activities mainly on repealing resolution adopted by the UN in November 1975.
The above-mentioned resolution stated that Zionism is an obvious form of racism.
The Zionist Organization referred to the resolution as "a great disgrace that must be removed from documents of the United Nations". Hence, in the largest circulation magazines and newspapers in the United States they published a statement in this regard signed by hundreds of Protestant churches and a number of religious figures.
Finally, with so much pressure and efforts, in the early nineties this organization forced the United Nations to abolish its previous resolutions on racism of the Zionist movement.
Lee O'Brien, an American author says:
Without exaggeration, we can say that most of the policy decisions that the General Assembly of the United Nations has approved in 1983 approved are clear signs of Assembly’s support of Israel.
He adds that: (in the same year), the United Nations decided that "Israel is the only strong and reliable ally of the United States of America in the region and strengthening the cooperation between America and Israel is a must." In another decree, continuing and increase aid to Israel is emphasized and American government is requested to technically and financially help Israeli government to build a fighter plane in Israel called "Levi" (shortly after the question, the government led by Reagan granted the approved aid).
It should be added here that in this meeting, also discussed issues and topics, but they refused to vote is, of course, this is also a form of support for Israel. An example of this approach, suggested stopping Israeli settlement in the West Bank, despite the approval of a number of representatives, the plan was not put to a vote.
The emphasis on the performance of the Zionist lobby in America, should not be under the impression that the rest of the world outside of the influence of the clan. The fact is that thanks to pressure from the people of most countries in the world, especially European countries, especially the western part of the continent weighed.
In this case, mentioning some examples won’t go amiss.
1. Roge Garoudi, French Muslim thinker, in his preface to the French edition of his book “Legendary origins of the Israeli policy” says:
After more than half a century from the publication of my scientific works by the major French publishers, today I have to publish this book at my own cost because in 1982 I had committed a violation of sanctities, and I have been critical of Israeli policies.
2. In the eighties of the twentieth century, one of the PhD students of the University of Nantes, with the artistic name of Rukiya, chose "gas chambers" as the theme of his academic thesis and with rely on the statements and confessions of a submitted German officer to French forces, questioned the Nazi death cells. Defense Session of the paper was held in quiet and was accepted by the faculty supervisor members with a good rank.
But the same author had a radio interview on the topic of his thesis and the results he had taken and consequently Jews created uproar and as a result, thesis was rejected and by the order of the French Minister of Higher Education, the author’s Ph.D. degree abolished and his advisor was also expelled from the university.
3. One of the judges of "Hamburg" in 1981 published a book entitled “The Myth of Aushfetz” which sparked uproar of Jewish Germans.
Jewish residents of this country made such a ruckus that Göttingen University was forced to abolish the doctoral degree which was awarded to the author. The government also reduced the judge's monthly salary to 10% as a continuous fine.
Also in 1994 the parliament passed a law that would "deny the existence of death camps Jews" and punishable by imprisonment for up to five years was a crime.
4. For several years the attacks against the English historian, David Irving is done because he has rejected the killing of Jews in Europe, as Zionists claim and advertise. Therefore, Jews occasionally surround his house in central London and protests against him.
His books have been collected from the market. Wherever he goes in the world, Jews like a shadow are chasing him. When he was invited to lecture in Canada, he was expelled from the country. The Australian government banned his entry into the country and the judiciary of Germany also fined him to pay ten thousand marks.
5. In Austria, a publisher named Jared Honsik was sentenced to eighteen months because after five years of continuous research and relying on various documents in his journal (Holt) he had announced that toxic gases in Nazi concentration camp had been used only to disinfect contaminated clothes and were never used against persons.