The free man; the man in charge

In the name of the most high
The free man; the man in charge
The question of being the right and defensible is the most important challenge for the political systems and Political Philosophy appears after these challenges so, political philosophy tries to philosophically justify the Principles of a good political system. This philosophical attempt is founded by giving originality to a kind of description of human characteristics. The Devine philosophers often, out of these celestial characteristics and the man's good angel, chooses one good characteristic as fundamental and justify a good political system based on it. But materialistic philosophers usually fixe their Political Philosophy based on one of the bestial characteristics of human anyway, whatever called fundamental, the principals of political foundation will be based on it. Commonly, the foundation of political systems is based on the idea of "social agreement". The western philosophers have often chosen one of the basic principals as their own philosophical justification. The man's wolf- like nature is one of the two principals based on which one of the scientist fixed the west political philosophy on it, while the other, for the idea of social agreement principals has planed another foundation and it is "man's free creation". To prove this, the writers of UN global declaration of human right started the first point by this statement that "all human being are born free" anyway, most of political philosophers of the west ,based on the second principal , are dealing with philosophical justification of liberal political systems. We can not justify the Islamic political system based on the political philosophy secularity because the secular thoughts are contrary to religious teachings and approaches. The teaching expression "the man has been born freely" is the first and the last teaching mixed with religion and the primary secular philosophers of the world have Longley profited it. Maybe, this teaching in modern political philosophy does the allegory known as the alarmed clock performance. The western physicist allegorized the world to a watch which the god alarmed it once and then has left the world uncontrollably in addition to this, the political western philosophers have thought that the god has created the man freely but after that, by the wisdom power that he gifted the man left him to his own control. The free man only by thinking power can found an acceptable political system while Islamic thoughts can not accept such idea in fact this belief does not reject the man freedom in Islam, but the goal is the fundamentality of man freedom in political system. The Islamic teaching philosophy expresses" responsibility " in justifying Islamic political system it also proves that, the man has been created responsible but no free and out of all creations only the man is in charge (will be questioned) because an old treaty is conducted between man and his god in which the great god swore the man to be sincere to the straight path thus, the straight path is god's treaty in which the Adam's son is in charge for it. The great god wants man to keep his promise because he will be asked about divine's treaty one day. Even if it is the arena of rule and policy because keeping the treaty in policy and ruling is much more necessary so, political system have to be fixed upon straight path. It is defined as a system which is far away from devil worship and commands worshiping pure god. The son of Adam is created in charge and responsible even in policy and government and every one will be asked weather they fixed policy and ruling based on straight path or no
Trusteeship is associated with responsibility in fact, wherever is an honesty there is a responsibility, too so, malversation makes the man to be questioned. The holy Quran has talked of significant issue and it is embracing divine sincerity. The great god gifted a giant safekeeping to the skies, earth and earthy creatures to carry this load of safekeeping but all of celestial and earthy creatures feared of caring it and did not shoulder the responsibility and only the man adopted and shouldered the responsibility therefore, this safekeeping is not something except velayat and ruling because there is no a safekeeping more giant than velayat and policy. According to Faize Kashani's interpretation of this holy verse who differently narrated from our Imams , the goal of this safekeeping is Imamat and Velayat as it was narrated from Imam Reza" the safekeeping is the same velayat and every one who unfairly fight for Velayat in fact , he is pagan.
Velayat and policy is the divine's gift (Amanat) and the man is in charge for it. Because the man is prone to malversation (destroying Amanat) it is done either by oppression or ignorance as Holy Quran points to these two factor, as well. In the arena of ruling and policy, the man commits oppression out of ignorance and oppression and even the man may oppressively and by ignorance interprets government as a non-divine ruling system in fact , he justifies and determines government and Velayat based on secular and earthy concepts. Undoubtedly, political philosophers in justifying secular government do not prefer freedom hypothesis to responsibility thoughts. Freedom hypothesis is not the justifier of human responsibility and never can we call the men responsible because the idea of freedom can not tolerate any responsibility in fact, responsibility is restrictive agent for real freedom and human being's wisdom has restricted freedom with responsibility as the western philosophers have allowed the freedom to the extend that it doesn’t harm others. This restriction not only is not the reason of freedom hypothesis truth, but also it is based on the common sense based on which the freedom is defined in this way. But the responsibility teaching is the freedom's justifier and the common sense without being forced to express the secondary sentence because the concept of responsibility is the right, interpret the human right for freedom therefor, to this reason freedom is not a criteria for responsibility and freedom does not restrict the responsibility while responsibility is a restrictive for freedom henceforth, the idea of "freedom responsibility" is meaningless but the idea of" responsible freedom " has a clear concept overall, by freedom hypothesis we can not provide the human responsibility and talk about it but, by responsibility teachings we can guarantee the freedom.
The freedom hypothesis does not cause a maximum responsibility when responsibility teachings defend it as it was pointed, responsibility is a necessary factor. Lack of harming others is an emergent work. if a man due to the disability of others does not feel any threat ,he would act by the order of freedom hypothesis oppressively as well as proudly but if he felt such threats, due to emergency ,makes himself force to respect the others' right henceforth , the rule of " what is unfair to you , is unfair to others ,too" in freedom hypothesis is an emergent rule not a natural one . One of the scientists exactly after planning this rule has concluded the rejection of freedom. And this conclusion is: "the human's avoidance of his right to everything is equal to his privation of freedom and warning the others' to avoid of their right to everything, too"
They are not, only the poor and the oppressed who are after the freedom idea and for them talking about the humanistic responsibilities of governors is more important than the right of freedom, but it is the proud and oppressing governors who are happy of freedom idea henceforth, the load of responsibility on freedom discussion comes to the least and the slogan of freedom is " the lesser the responsibility, the more freedom"
The man usually has been facing with four kinds of relation which is called his relation with himself, relation with others, relation with nature and his relation with great god. Any communication, for human is threatening freedom and brings responsibility to him. Talking about freedom could only get along with responsibility of relation with others therefore, this compromise not only is not by satisfaction but also is out of necessity. Each of the modern political philosophies in order to justify the least responsibility, by freedom hypothesis help, has been entered the scene. The western political philosophers have incorporated in this way that the man in his relation with god doesn’t have any responsibility. According to them, the belief in god is something quite personal and doesn’t have any effect on this world so, due to the possibility of tragic events we may be forced to avoid the right of freedom.
The value of nature is not equal to man in order that we are being forced to restrict the freedom, however; the nature is primarily the slave and servant of the man henceforth, any lord is not respondent to his slave if any, it is based on munificent and forgiveness not commitment .
The allowance and sacrilege to divine religions and nature, in modern life, derives from democratic talks which is never willing to know that the man is in charge because of his relationship with god as well as nature.
According to the materialistic philosophy, the man's relation with himself does not bring responsibility because; primarily in such relation there is no one so that the man for his sake is being forced to accept the responsibility. The responsibility teachings have a maximum outlook therefore; such an outlook welcomes any responsibility. The man is not responsible toward people but is responsible to god, himself and nature because, all of these affairs are true and every truth have originated from god and this is a reality out of which only true believers know it.
This universality of celestial philosophy is not found in materialistic philosophies henceforth, a maximum outlook toward responsibility is only available in divine's political philosophy and exactly it is to this reason that the Islamic government's task is heavier than other earthy and secular ones. The materialistic philosophers avoid of universality of truth therefore, the performers of this non-religion governments do not shoulder the responsibility, too, so, It is reason that oppression and injustice in these governments has come to its summit.