
In analyzing the causes of the arms race in the Middle East and its consequences for security and stability in the region, mostly Western politicians, condemn researchers and defensive and military policies of the Middle Eastern countries so, They, consciously and with a political purpose, do not refer to Israel's defensive policies, and they virtually ignore the Israel's nuclear arsenal. While every president since Eisenhower till klyntvn have been well aware of the Israeli nuclear capability the American officials have been trying to keep it hidden from the eyes of the world. Therefore the important questions poses is as follow: Does the Israel have a nuclear bomb, but we do not mean only nuclear power, but we want to know whether there are nuclear weapons in the arsenals of the Israel? Doesn’t the nuclear arsenal of the Israeli raise the Arab conflict, particularly on the issue of Palestine? The second question, is important because, according to some Israeli researchers, one of the main reasons that forced Anvralsadat to sign a peace treaty with Israel, was his knowledge of Israel's nuclear capability henceforth, he had concluded that "We can not defeat the Israel in battle, so the only way remains for Egypt is to deal with it. Recently spoke of peace negotiating between Palestine and Israel is heard. Another group of researchers have assumed that the main cause Palestinians accepted peace talks is their knowledge regarding the Israel's military power. Notable point is that the Israel seriously decided to make a nuclear weapons fifty years ago, Since 1948, scientists and experts of the Israel began to extract uranium from phosphate deposits in the Negev Desert Where the "Dymvnh" plant was built and the first Israel's atomic bomb between 1965 and 1970 was carried over to nuclear arsenal of the Israel so, Investigating various documents and sources suggest that there are about 50 and 400 nuclear weapons in the Israel's arsenals{ some say at least there are 50 nuclear bomb in the Israel}. In the years before 1967, there was an important issue in the Israeli defense circles, at that time the Israelis were concerned about the Soviet Union or China's help the Arabs and they feared may be, by the help of these two countries, the Arabs may obtain nuclear weapon so, these worries resulted two different theory in military and defensive settings of the Israel so, Some believed that for the Israel's survival achieving these weapons, and other weapons of mass destruction, is necessary on the other side, other group believed that the main issue is keeping peace so, they believed that they if the Israel possesses such weapons , especially American nuclear weapons and other powerful nations, it is possible the powerful nations put big Jewish countries under the pressure so that they put mass killing weapons aside. This group did not think that these types of weapons used in the limited border clashes with the Arab neighboring countries or resistance of none- state groups who battled in the occupied territories or outside them. This issues which secretly discussed in the defensive settings of the Israel in the late 1960 made the Israel decide or resorts to nuclear vague strategies as result, the Israel does not legally confess which have such capability but, often , from formal or informal settings proclaims that in 1970 one the most important American newspaper reported that the Israel have such ability however; in 1968, two years ago, SIA organization had informed that the Israel have enough capability to produce nuclear head for the Bush's Jerry rockets. In the December of 1974, after the war of 1973, may be for the first time a high Israeli expert pointed informally to this issue so, at that time Partzil was the Israel's president. He , in reaction to this claim, said that our goal as Jewish government has been this that we achieve nuclear weapon and at the time being we are potentially have such power so, in a short time or less than one day, we can produce such weapons because, we must choose all of the possible equipment to defend our country and also, we must, for more power, use new weapons in order to save us. After the presentation of the Israel's president, "Rabin' the Israel's prime minister were asked to explain more in this case. Esaq Rabin repeated that the Israeli will not be the first country which gets nuclear weapon in the middle East he , then added that we are not also the second, hence, there are main points in this talks and there are may cases of this equivocal claims by the Israeli heads so, on the one hand , they claim that there will not be a country which make the Middle East atomic and on the other side, they say we will not allow any country to be more powerful than us and have nuclear weapon. All the American presidents since 1950 decades on have been aware of the Israel's nuclear ambitions but due to political reasons they decided to avoid it in fact, the Israel itself, either censors the existence of nuclear arsenal by the state's silence and intense security rules or in this secrecy all the Israeli are cooperating but, what has been the Arabs' reaction to this issue? the Middle East countries and the Arabs have some time protested to this issue especially the Islamic republic of Iran , in different settings, warned about Israel's nuclear arsenals and have pronounced their objections concerning ambiguity of policies and discrimination which big political powers undergo in this case and also, this issue was protest by Iran that which countries , in the Middle East, are deserved to have nuclear energy and which country are not right to have it only for peaceful purposes. Hosni Mubarak's councilors protested to this issue that the Israel was skipped regarding the contracts of mass killing weapons and didn’t sign the treaty of lack of spreading nuclear weapons. This issue nearly has united all the Middle east nations altogether so that they don’t have such weapons in their arsenals nevertheless, the Israel doesn’t have any commitment to this treaties so, this discrimination has made the situation unfair and has caused instabilities in the middle East. Even in the negotiations made in 1995 between Shimon Pérez and Hosni Mubarak this issue suggested but, due to the American pressure on the Egypt, the Egypt ended its immediate insistence on the Israel on the other side, the Israel promised that during one year after signing peace treaty between, from one side Israel and another side Lebanon and Syria from other side, give a treaty to sign. Prez , on that time, in his speeches clearly legally claimed that the Israel has nuclear power and He said: "After the arrival of peace in the Middle East, we will have a nuclear weapons-free zone". To our comment, at the moment we are living in atomic Middle East and the nuclear center of the Israel is in a triangle which its rule is along with Mediterranean coach and its head in Jerusalem so, most people are aware of " Dimouna" plants which has been placed in northern part of Naqabe desert and annually extracts 88 ton platinum. The Israel's military forces have radars and electronic detective systems so, flying all airplanes and even the Israel's air force above Dimoune is forbidden. Regarding recent atomic capability of the Israel, there are conflicts, so it is evident that the Israel has such ability. Israel, even, in 1965, nearly two years before war of 1967 between the Arab and Israel possessed to nuclear bomb therefore, the Israel's prime minister on that time, commanded preparation of two atomic bomb which were the first weapons of the Israel and ten years later at the beginning of 6 day war the Israeli airplanes flied on Sina desert and the prepared bomb were ready to drop. According to a report , in the war of 1973,the Israel have 13 bomb or other reports about 100 , and right now have 400 atomic bomb henceforth, there is no doubt that the Israel have had such weapons and have now so, what is important now is the reactions of other Middle East nation toward the Israel. The question is that for discussing about a safe Middle East and empty of nuclear and mass killing weapons, must we wait to see until the Israel gets strategic ability or decides to change its equivocal nuclear strategy to an evident stopping one. The important point is that does this atomic ability endanger the security of the Middle East?
The concern of many researchers who insist on atomic control of weapons in the Middle East, is not the issue that the Israel doesn’t use this weapons in the battles or against the Palestine so, their main concern is that the Israel, used this weapon as before as nuclear toll and also use them in order to achieve political end so, in 1973 since the Israel needed USA by receiving military equipment, used nuclear threats against USA so that it can achieves its practical ends. In the war of Pacific Ocean which broke out by Iraq's attack to Kuwait, the spying American satellites reported that atomic heads are placed in the Israel's crockets and it was a threat to the USA so that the USA speed up sending missile beam to the Israel so, this is the political use of these nuclear weapons, which has concerned many experts in the Middle East. The reaction Middle Eastern must show is that to pressure on the Israel by great powers so that they use their influence to persuade the Israel sends out these weapons from its arsenals therefore, they must do it in international settings for example we can do it in international Islamic conferences strictly or the Arab union or areal organizations. The Islamic Revolution is, may be the first country in the Middle East which by specific sensitivity has followed many diplomatic efforts nevertheless, it requires all the Middle East countries to collaborate in these efforts.
/ج