The evolution of Revolution in the years after victory

The author of this essay refers to the effects of Islamic Revolution on the Muslin Societies, and also expresses his concerns on the political developments of Iran in recent
Wednesday, March 2, 2016
Estimated time of study:
موارد بیشتر برای شما
The evolution of Revolution in the years after victory
   The evolution of Revolution in the years after victory

 

Translator: Davood Salehan
Source: rasekhoon.net





 

Theoretical problems and future prospect

Abstract

The author of this essay refers to the effects of Islamic Revolution on the Muslin Societies, and also expresses his concerns on the political developments of Iran in recent years, and considers the phenomenon of reform and the slogans of freedom, democracy, civil society, and political development in Iran as signs of weakness in religious and anti-arrogant approaches of the revolution.
The author also discusses about the West's efforts to prevent the union of Islamic countries and bringing schism within them. And in the end, he expresses his hope, that the Islamic Republic, based on the views of Imam Khomeini (the kindness of God) and Muslim primary obstacles, emerge from this test successfully.

Introduction

In my opinion, enthusiasts and supporters of the Islamic Republic, in which there are aware the greatness performance of the leader, Imam Khomeini, consider it necessary that:
- First: the dear Iranian nation and the Islamic Republic's leaders and authorities, be aware of the political, social, cultural, and religious movements of Islamic philosophers and Muslim nations outside of Iran.
- Second, the Iran mass media, including radio, television, and the press, with the continuous efforts and following, should try to this matter, and by considering Muslim’s reaction all over the world, identify a good policy to defend the Islamic revolution and regime and the lofty causes, and choose an appropriate policy to defend revolution and Islamic Regime and the lofty causes. In particular, some Islamic nations faced intellectual-cultural invasion of the West and Christianity, and colonial cultural invasion are considered to be the reasons of its weakness and decadence, in modern times.
It should be mentioned that, the mass media of the Islamic Republic, with its programs in Arabic, was able to broad great impacts on those nations in the Arab world that the Islamic Republic is known as the vanguard of Islam, and they are proud of it, not to leave any kind of weakness and shortcomings in their minds. But on the contrary, I have doubts about the correct informing in the matter of Islamic movements that must counter face the obvious and hidden thoughts of global arrogant, by cooperate and consult and solidarity with other nations, and do not know whether they are correctly informed to Iranian in Farsi or not.
In my writings and speeches and interviews, in recent years conferences in Tehran and Damascus, respected to the anniversary of the demise of Imam, I have listed the reasons for the failure of Islamic revolutions in Algeria and Afghanistan, and mentioned that, Muslims around the world pity the victory of Islamic Revolution of Iran, thanks to the leadership of Imam Khomeini (the kindness of God).
But suddenly, the Muslim world faces with a phenomenon called "reformist", which not only rejects the idea of "velayat-e faqih", but also uses the slogan of freedom, democracy, and self-determination for the people, political development, and people's rights and civil society head. And not long after, there are protests by university students and the happening of events. It was clear, that practically all of the oppositions targeted the Islamic nature of the regime from the beginning with the deceptive slogans and protests. This was the reason, in which the leader of the Islamic Movement of Marrakech (Morocco) in response to a reporter's question network of "Al Jazeera" Qatar, said:
"Iranian revolution, after a power struggle and dealing with domestic issues rather than Islam, doesn’t have that much effects and glory as before.”
The truth is that, nations and Sunni Islamist movements, vouched and supported the Islamic Revolution, led by Imam Khomeini, and against the Shah and his arrogant supporters, and the Islamic Republic despite of the Persians being "Shiite" religious, because of its independence, freedom and Islamic culture and civilization, and despite of religious differences, and they will support it, as long as the Islamic Republic of Iran is supportive of this unifying principles, and it’s this unifying Islamic laws which Imam Khomeini by using them, could establish the revolution and the Islamic government, and with historical significant successes, not only won the attention and welcome of all Islamic nations, but also caused the West World to wonder and admire him.
The views of the Muslim world and the West over the Islamic Republic of Iran, during the eight years of President Hojatoleslam Hashemi Rafsanjani, did not change, because at that time no ambiguity in the rule of velayat-e faqih, in any of the areas of the religion, neither in political nor social, and for the first time, a rule was made that was successful in confrontation and encounter with colonist that by using not only the weapons of mass destruction but also the weapons of "Layysm" and " Irreligion" are fighting the Islamic world. Whereas before this, the global arrogance was able, by its own ways, to govern various parties and dominations, and by using various tools, spread the irreligious culture and civilization of the West in Muslim countries as well as West.
In such an era, when the great prophet of Islam, had announced the "separation rules of the Quran" and warned the Muslims of it, how is it possible that the government called "Islamic Republic" is established and the foundations of the state be based on the unchangeable principles and values of Islam? In particular, according to the tradition of the Prophet (peace be upon him and his progeny), reported by Maze ebn Jabal, we can see that for him, the age is the same age that we live in.
"You should know that Islam is a circulating wheel. Therefore, everywhere be aware of Quran and follow it, in which many rulers may separate their way from the Quran. So you do not separate from the Quran. "(2)
This is always the problem of Muslim states for people. It means that those states would follow the idea of democracy and Layysm which is supported by the elections. This elections, is not more than a political game of misleading and deceptive.
So as long as the supreme law of the Islamic state, according to the divine precepts, no one has no right to any person at any time under any circumstances, including humanitarian law, freedom, democracy, the right of nations to self-determination, and based on the concepts of West caused by the separation of religion from politics and government, to establish a government that would have absolute freedom in their function and their purpose of the Constitution, only to serve special group’s interests. Unfortunately it must be said now, in ninety percent of the Muslim countries, the governments like this are in charge.
In such a situation, the Islamic Republic of Iran, as a new and unique movement in innovations of political and religious history was not common was able to combine secular and religious dimension (material and spiritual), and put duties of each of the fields of religion and politics to its own institutions and in the meantime, the supreme leader, would be the leader and responsible for the preservation of "Islamic" aspects of ideological, intellectual, cultural and moral regime.
However, with the passage of two decades of the Revolution, that despite some insufficiencies- was successful, the Islamic regime by moving against the Islamic regime was facing the West, while the West World supporting it, called it reformation, followed by incidents such as student protests which took place, and in the meantime, a new ambiguity created in the minds: we thought that the Islamic revolution has removed the Shah's generation and its various groups ranging from radical leftists and communists, racist nationalists and extremist atheists, and eliminated their risk forever. But it seems that, these groups to help their new supporters, born again and have come to the scene.
I as a non-Arab Muslim Researcher and Sociologist, believe that Muslim nations protected the characteristics and originality of, usually because they are in the minority, and better they could protect against numerous enemies. The best example in this case, is the people of Chechnya and Dagestan against the Russian invaders.
No doubt, the authorities loyal to the Islamic Republic of Iran Imam Khomeini, know very well that they are the leaders of the Third Islamic Revolution in the second half of the twentieth century that upraised in 1357, in the name of Islam and against the world arrogant regimes.
On the other hand, the leaders of the revolution are aware of this fact that, the France arrogance, in the deviation of the Algerian revolution and its transformation into a secular government, in which the country's Muslims still suffer from persecutions and conspiracies, had an important role there as well, the United States and the Soviet Union and their allies, after the Islamic revolution of Afghanistan, with much effort, could prevent the establishment of an Islamic government in this country, in order to prevent the Islamic states of Afghanistan, Iran and Pakistan and other Islamic countries united and able to resist the West and Israel’s conspiracy. That is why, the US and Russia, since the collapse of the Soviet Union and Afghanistan Revolution, used all their military and political power to create ethnic and racial divisions and arming them to fight each other, and Instead of a unified Islamic state, establish a non-united and non-racial government and gradually turn it into a monarchy and they practically dominate it. If such a state is established in Afghanistan, its role would be as the role and influence of the "Israel", and the establishment of a state of the non-Arab and non-racial Islamic countries in Central Asia and the Far East, will be prevented. Since the creation of such a union in the Muslim world, certainly will change the structure of the racist Arab regimes and Islamic governments, and will turn them into the united and under control of people kind of government, and destroy this humiliating and divisional case of Arab Countries, in which they had been tamed by Israel and its supporters. Such an action will certainly be against the will and demand of the arrogance.
In fact, as mentioned above, the medium-term and long-term strategy aimed at the West and Israel in the Islamic and Arab countries is that many scholars, intellectuals and political leaders aware and unaware of it and the media and the West, East Communist and an atheist, was silent on it.
In fact, as mentioned above, in the same medium-term and long-term strategy and aim at the West and Israel in the Islamic and Arab countries, many scientists, intellectuals, and political leaders are not aware of it, and the mass media, the West, and the Communist and atheist east, was silent on it.
But the new phenomenon, or in other words, a new disaster in the Islamic Republic of Iran is that, gradually it may incline toward the West World Figure, and follows it i.e. by party-religious divisions over power and to keep the public opinion busy to a leftist newspaper, whose main aim is to debilitate the principles and values of the Islamic state, turn the fighting scene of the external enemy to the conflict between domestic groups of people, and by ideas of Marxism and the Western mass media, invade the concepts details of Islamic civilization, even though the general philosophy of the divine laws are understandable according to its issues, including these issues: women's rights, the family system, equality, freedom, democracy, the music and dancing, veil, nemesis, etc. How is it possible that, the Iranian revolution and the Islamic regime is faced with such events, while it is only twenty years old?
In fact, rather than the West accusing Iran of forming revolution in Arab countries, we should say that it is the West that has been able to export the "secular revolution" to the Arab world, and today tries to export it in Islamic regime as well.
It was expected that the Islamic Republic of Iran, under the presidency of the Organization of Islamic Conference head, that showed his fitness and competence in the construction of meeting hall and the location of the country’s leaders seats and the opening ceremony of speeches, to use this opportunity also, and in addition to the reformed procedures and guidelines of the Islamic Conference, proposed to sign a "contract to defend the security of the Nation of Islam" - with any title acceptable to everyone- take this into consideration that the right to "defend the security" is an international right which the Union of Europe used it, but in Arab countries have failed to work, this time in the Muslim world this proposal happened due to Iran. But even this did not work either!
On the other hand, it was our opinion that the "Islamic revolution" and "Islamic state" without a doubt and discussion, enfolds "the Islamic community". But suddenly, we face with the slogan of "civil society", while this term is a western concept and purely secular, which the West made it to use instead of "religious community". It should be recognized that this term, is not only a classic slogan, but is one of the established and deep concepts of secular Western civilization, that the West, by using advertising and communication and culture tools, took it as a new approach in the developed political culture toward our countries, and tries to infuse our future generations’ political thoughts.
It was a glimpse into the image of the Islamic Revolution, twenty years after the success due to the view of scientists and Islamic movements abroad, and the country as "the West", which although geographically is far from it, but in terms of thought, believes, and faith it is actually very close.
The views, is an analysis based on three basic ideas as following:
A) The views of the leader of the revolution, Imam Khomeini and the policies set by them for the present and future.
B) In the view of the position of Islam and warnings about the intrigue and contemporary problems and the solutions presented against them.
C) In the analysis of the Islamic political and social views, synchronized with the awakening of Muslim nations in the world along with the sign of the times are the creation of liberation movements in the Arab and Islamic nations to free themselves from colonialism in the first half of the twentieth century, in which although independent governments of those movements, again have been caught in the trap of colonialism. In the second half of this century, we also witnessed both Israel came into existence, and despite the opposition of the Arab world, occupied the Palestinian. On the other hand, the Algerian revolution failed, and the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan, who won the second superpower, is still facing threats, and confronting their religious and political union enemies. Then we following the establishment of the Islamic Revolution, which had the unprecedented victory over the arrogant power, today put it against in front of a new challenge. Without doubt, Iran will be able to pass through this test, again with success and victory with the help of the Almighty God, and introduce the Islamic world as a global power and save the human society from the eve of the collapse of this vortex that it is located.

/J

 

 



Send Comment
با تشکر، نظر شما پس از بررسی و تایید در سایت قرار خواهد گرفت.
متاسفانه در برقراری ارتباط خطایی رخ داده. لطفاً دوباره تلاش کنید.