Reasons behind Appearance of Zionism

The issue of reasons behind formation of Zionism should be analyzed from two different viewpoints. One is the view based on political Zionism and the other is the view based on religious Zionism; the unification of both view can now be seen in the appearance of occupying regime of Israel. Today, we can consider occupying regime of Quds to be the full-fledge representative of political Zionism while religious Zionism should be regarded as a kind of organized ideology and mindset that precedes political Zionism. Because even if we look in the historical facts, it was Zionist ideology that provided the required ground for Herzl and his companions-a phrase used by Russian researcher Yuri Ivanov- to establish a Zionist government. That’s why with the revealing of shaded points and awakenings of people all over the world, Zionists are set to forge the history and show the ideology of political Zionism a historical one so as to hide their evil and satanic intentions of creating this cancer among the pages of history.
This issue will become clear when reasons behind appearance of political and religious Zionism is revealed as it really is, not as it is advertised.

Reasons behind appearance of political Zionism

Reasons behind appearance of political Zionism can be explained by referring to two main basis: (i) Jewish ethnic-historical reasons; and (ii) imperialist-colonial reasons.

(i) Jewish ethnic-historical reasons

Jews as a people having distinct and specific characteristics lived in the host societies and were known for living in the ghetto or specific neighborhoods and separated from non-Jews and therefore they transferred these properties to the next generations. Continuation of these features in successive generations, aroused similar reactions from the host communities. In other words in succeeding centuries, Jewish communities had always problems which were in common with the host community, and urged them to remedy for these problems.
Occasionally some people set to solve these problems, but because of the considerable obstacles no one could do anything about it until Theodor Herzl who did a series of actions, however, they had some influence on political sovereignty and reduced their economic and cultural problems to a certain degree. Aside from factors such as isolation and introversion characteristics and influential figures in the political Zionist Jews and their desire to live in ghettos, their historical-ethnical mythologies was an effective factor in accelerating the formation of political Zionism. Myths such as the centuries-old history of the Jews in Palestine, and their being expelled from several host countries also inspired them to some extent to have motivation for creating a government for themselves.

(ii) Imperialist-colonial reasons

Aside from ethnic-historical reasons, the more powerful and-from the viewpoints of some researchers and chronologists-more important reason behind the formation of political Zionism was colonial benefits of imperialist countries. The motivation of forming a Jewish state was never an end to for the host countries all of which were colonial countries. They have always considered Jews as a tool that can guarantee their interests. The same approach in 1654, centuries before Theodor Herzl and his companions came with the idea of forming a Jewish state, England decided to accommodate Jews in one of its colony called Suriname. France also had a similar plan for them.
And who does not know that at that time most countries and it can be said that the whole Earth was colonized by a number of imperial powers among which were Britain and France. But in 1799 the first attempt to colonize Palestine was carried out by Napoleon Bonaparte and was due to strategic considerations. But this attempt failed. Nahum Sakalo in speaking of this subject writes: but because the campaign (i.e. Napoleon's invasion from Egypt to Syria) failed, there appeared a schism in Jewish faith - not to the main subject but regarding the time and means of action. Gradually with the decline of the Ottoman Empire, the British colonial their bid to reach the goal of sending Jews to the Syrian territory occupied by Egyptian forces raised. But at this time other powers who coveted the fertile soil of Palestine and sensitive position it.
With the atmosphere created by the immigration of Jews, the Chief Rabbi of Great Britain opposed Jewish immigration and in a letter written in 1854 to religious sphere under its influence:
Destiny of Jews is in the hand of God who has ordered them not to take any action motivating His wrath until the day He decides…
But as to the formation of political Zionism due to colonial factors, what was clearly significant was the issue of using Jews as a tool by imperialist powers.
Considering this approach, colonial countries with the aim of attaining their interests in the 1870s, established the association of colonizing Syria and Palestine in England. According to Russian researcher Yuri Ivanov it was the probable time for the creation of Zionism as one of the leaders of Zionism in the early twentieth century had said that the time has come for Britain to create Zionism, if it wasn’t formed before. Herzl, the main character in the foundation of Zionism, in a visit with Joseph Chamberlain (1836-1914)-the minister of colonies- in attracting the attention of British Empire clearly alludes to the role of Zionism in safeguarding colonial interests of British Empire; he has stated that:
When British Empire supported and confirmed attempts done by Zionism, not only gets access to a colony, but also attracts the hearts of more than ten millions of Jews… and in that way that land turns into the garrison of Jews and British Empire put trust into hearts of its Jewish supporters all over the world. All the armies will be waiting for a little sign of British Empire to provide their sincere services; in a word, England possesses ten millions mercenaries to pave the way for its greatness and its kingdom.
Another reason for the colonial nature of Zionist regime is the issue of its fake age-old history; Jews believe that this thought dates back to the kingdom of Bokhtonnasr. But there are evidences showing that essentially leaders of Zionist movement had no emphasis on establishing their government in Palestine at first and looked only for a country to give them the right to independency; Zionism father, Theodor Herzl, suggested in the sixth congress that they be a Jewish colonial and independent state with their own Jewish system in eastern Africa near Uganda. Although his suggestion was not accepted, but this shows that in those days their colonial ideologies under the persona of Zionism was clearer.
In summary we can state the reasons for the emergence of political Zionism in the late 19th century on the basis of colonial motivation:
1. The colonial rivalry between Great Britain and France in the Middle East and efforts to expand its colonial territory in the late nineteenth century is partly due to the awakening of nations was a major obstacle in the way of colonists, led the colonists to seek a reasonable excuse for occupation of the Middle East and making their support for the idea of Jewish settlement in Palestine. Because this provides the best opportunity for colonization of Palestinian decent.
2. Intensification of class clashes and independency motivation among labors made imperialist countries support any regime which was opposed to such movements and because of this reason they supported Zionism because it guaranteed the interests of imperialist countries.
3. Fences of Middle Ages ghettos made this possible for Jewish leaders to have control over people but with the development of modernity and industrial revolution such barriers collapsed and consequently the leaders faced problems in controlling mass population but with the emergence of Zionism they would be able to limit Jewish population all over the world in that spiritual ghetto fence and make much use of them.
4. Suez Canal was considered a vital lifeline to colonial country of Britain and the existence of a government committed to the England side channel, which agrees with the British colonial policies and was against the people of the region was not void of use. Haim Weizmann, who after the death of Herzl held the presidency of Zionist Organization in November 1914 in a letter to the editorial board of Manchester Guardian wrote:
Now we can claim that if Palestine comes under the power and influence of Great Britain and the UK and put this land as their colony and an accommodation for Jews, we can over the next thirty years populate the land with about one million Jews so as to transfer the civilization to that part of the world and change its face and as be a confident and active guard for the Suez Canal.
5. In the First World War, the country of Great Britain felt that the war is heavily skewed in favor of enemy; in such a critical situation sought help from wealthy Jews of America and asked for the support of Jews in Germany and its allies, and knew that only Jews can do that. Because Louis Brandeis, leader of the Zionist movement in America and first Jewish judge in the Supreme Court of the United States could use its influence in the Wilson President of America, and involve the United States in the war in favor of the Allies. The UK delegation of the Jewish national homeland in Palestine as Jews, for their efforts in bringing America to win the British in the war, agreed, and for the Zionist movement before it was contributed as an ideology.
6. Effort and seriousness of scholars, politicians and Zionist capitalists was very effective in achieving this goal, as Theodor Herzl, Ashergizenberg, Edmond de Rothschild, Haim Weizmann, and General Allen B. did their best to achieve their goals traveled to different countries to appeal to those governments.
7. Jews and Zionist organizations because of possessing enormous wealth and ethnic features in the capitalist world and also because of their internal cohesion and strength, had wide influence in the media as a means in service of the interests of global arrogance and colonial system. England with the promise of Balfour while attracting Jews, used their funds to rebuild the destruction caused by the First World War.
8. The intellectual foundation of the World Zionism and colonizers are quite common. Both put force and power as the basis for the right and have repeatedly said that according to nature, the right is with those possessed of power. Both share a common characteristic in plundering the wealth of other communities. Both ridicule the characteristics and moral values of human and both are looking for expansion and violation of the rights of other nations.
9. Aside from all the reasons stated, no reason like negligence of Muslim and Arabic governments was more contributing to the development of this cancer and opening the way for the takeover of Palestine. The ignorance and backwardness was to the extent that the Egyptian government aiming to build the Suez Canal had spent sixteen million pounds, and because it had incurred a debt equivalent to one hundred million lira in order to pay the principal and interest of the this loan which was about three hundred million pounds, sold its 176 million shares in November 1875 for only four million pounds! While in 1910, the same amount of stock worth 35 million pounds. Of course, this is just the financial aspects of the issue, but its political aspect was far more important.
And in this way the colonialism expanded its economic and political dominance in the region and became the official magistrate of the region and without any serious opposition offered Palestine to the heads of Zionism as a personal property, and practically established a base in the best place in the Middle East and beyond it the best Strategic place among three continents. So that it could have control over the only area where the murmur of awakening people was heard and continue its age-old colonial policies with a new way.
So far, the causes of the rise of political Zionism on the basis of ethnic-historical and imperial-colonial factors were stated. But as it was mentioned in the previous sections, political Zionism was only one side of the coin of Zionism. Religious Zionism was another side of this coin and in a way it was a side that complemented and sanctioned all anti-human form of this movement. Therefore in order to fully understand the phenomenon and its causes we should devote to the investigation of the causes of the emergence of religious Zionism; the sum of the two bases will help us to clearly understand the universality of this phenomenon.

Reasons behind the emergence of religious Zionism

Religious Zionism can be broadly defined as an idea with the basis that the returning of Jews to Palestine and formation of a government was based on the scriptures and the teachings of God. Religious Zionism should be examined from two perspectives:
A. Religious Zionism based on Jewish scriptures and the teachings of their religion
B. Religious Zionism based on the New Testament or Christian perspective.
It should be noted that among Jews and Christians there are people who strongly disagree fundamentally with the idea of Zionism and the Israeli government, which in turn will be mentioned.
A. Religious Zionism based on Jewish scriptures and the teachings of their religion
If we want to examine the thought of returning to Palestine or Zionist movement based on the Jewish scriptures, we just can see this movement inspired by the Old Testament, which has a fundamentalist interpretation and dry from of its wording. As today's ruling usurper state of Israel has such a belief. Returning to the land of Palestine (Judea - Israel) and the establishment of this government and later taking revenge on the people of other lands especially those living in adjoining lands constitutes the idealistic content of many Old Testament passages and it is on this very basis that the increased territory and land is ingrained in many of the thoughts of Judaism.
Bible looks at returning as a sacred and religious duty, and even in many cases this is the Yahweh (God of Israel) who encourages returning to an inherited land, occupying it and deportation of its residents.
When the Yahweh, your God, disappear the nations to whom you have departed to occupy, and dispossess them and you will settle in their lands.
Because you are crossing the Jordan to enter and occupy the land that thy God (Yahweh) giveth thee to possess it and dwell in it.
Essentially, the God introduced in the Jewish religion and the prophets of such a God are so extreme, angry, wrathful, and bloodthirsty. The god who is constantly thinking of retaliation from other nations for the sake of the Jewish people's captivity.
Here, the prophet Joshua thinks of nothing but bloodshed and of course it is Joshua (Joshua that they have described, not the real one) who is put as an example in many crimes against humanity.
Menachem Barash in 1974, praising the Rabbi Moshe Ben-Zion in the newspaper Aydiot Ahorent who had used the biblical texts to describe the behavior of the Israeli-Palestinian, writes:
Torah has already warned about such a plague (!) on the way to the Promised Land that God had promised Abraham. We need to follow the method of Joshua to conquer the Land of Israel and establish our government there. In this land, no people except the Children of Israel should have the right to live. This means that we have to expel all those who are now living in the land; this is the sacred war that the Torah wants from us.
It is interesting to note that what they meant by the land was the Promised Land mentioned in the Bible. Because the Lord signed an alliance with Abraham with these words:
This is your descendants to whom I give this land, from the river of Egypt to the great river, the Euphrates River.
And the two blue lines that they draw on their flag refers to this section of the Torah, so that they never forget their covenant with God! But as we mentioned earlier, this idea (the idea of a big Zionism and Israel on the basis of religious texts) is rooted in the fundamentalist interpretation of the Torah, i.e. a literal interpretation of the allegories and metaphors making Jewish prophets and scribes into a nationalist and tribal history, and this is sufficient for apostasy of Zionist policy.
However, such an interpretation of the Torah leads to the paradox that the Israeli government statistics show that only 15 percent of the people are religious, and the majority of these have been told repeatedly that the land belongs to them because it is the land that God has promised... the God in whom they don’t believe! Today, the vast majority of Israelis are not involved in actions and not in religious faith and religious parties in Israel who play a decisive role cannot gather citizens except a tiny minority.
Roger Garody on the use of Bible for political goals of Israel writes:
In the current situation referring to religious texts in order to justify invasions and massacres is a major principle of Israeli policy. Bloody use of religious texts to justify criminal policies has got no religious basis, rather it is due to an extremist and literal interpretation of scriptures. This concept has been turned into a bloody racial scam.
On the basis of boundaries drawn in Torah for the Holy Land and relying on the ignorance of people and their fear the first of which was dealt with synagogue and a second one with the myth of eternal anti-Semitism, by creating a sense of extreme ethnicity (meaning the purest race among civilized nations) they provided further context for the realization of the Zionist movement. In all of the above cases we can clearly see their use of religious texts. Zionism began by begging the slogan of anti-Semitism and anti-Zionism by promoting the equal or hostility to Zionism and Zionism great help in the stabilization fund Israel's fledgling government, though the question of anti-Semitism from the eyes of the and historians, is a historical irony.
But with the help of colonial governments doing propaganda, the regime was able to benefit from this historical myth.
US Senator Jacques Tenne has said: any criticism of the Zionist Jewish organizations has only one answer and that is hostility to the Sami people, even if the critic himself is Jewish. He also adds that a lot of governments with the aim of freeing themselves from the accusation of anti-Semitism, have expended much in the interest of Zionism. Therefore, every time the wave and whisper of anti-Semitism wears off, the task of Zionism is to restart it. The charge has also been one of the tools that Zionism has used as a means of taking Palestine from its rightful owners and looting Dead Sea wealth.
The aforementioned slogan is now the most efficient tool to encourage the Jewish world Zionism to immigrate to the occupied Palestine. It should be noted that Zionists look for eternal roots of anti-Semitism and Jewish persecution in their scriptures. They relate their years of displacement and humiliation in the history which has been mentioned in the Torah to their racial superiority and choice. As his punishment, and people knew that God had chosen. Additionally, not only did they know this displacement to their loss, but also they considered it a blessing from God, so that God decreed exile for them to return to their homeland, Palestine, and thus any notable phenomenon in a Zionist goals defined by their media domination it was published around the world.
In the following section we’ll investigate religious Zionism based on the New Testament or Christian perspectives.
ii) Religious Zionism based on the New Testament or Christian perspectives
One of the wonders of the world of politics is the existence of controversies that occasionally finds its way among the common people and everyone has a different take on it based on his personal information. since the beginning of the formation of the sacred system of the Islamic Republic of Iran, perhaps the greatest demands that external enemies and internal hypocrites was to include the principle of the separation of religion and politics in the country's constitution; the debate still continues. Historically, the most important concern of scholars and Clergymen before and after the revolution, in the face of this erroneous view had been to put the policies and laws of the state in the name of religion and the divine laws.
But as to the issue of religious Zionism based on the New Testament or Christian perspectives, many of which are in the forefront of hostility to Islamic Republic of Iran, the question arises that if the separation of religion from politics is good, and makes the so-called freedom of opinion and contribute to the development of societies, why didn’t they opt for it? And when stand behind the podium of their global media and speak so warmly about the separation of religion from politics in certain countries, while they gather in their black and white palaces, to affairs on the basis of the Bible and religious scholars are the guidelines, and even go so far as barbaric and brutal killing of his killing and called holy war.
In this sense, the flourishing of political Zionist movement with the support of the Christian religion is one of the best examples of cooperation between religion and politics in this century. History researchers have claimed that if it wasn’t for the support of church and Christians, the racist regime of Israel could not find the chance to come into existence. Of course, apart from religious motivation and religious factors in the creation of the Zionist movement, evil intentions of the imperialist and colonial countries must be taken into account so that each one without the other is like an imperfect cause which is unable to create an effect.
In other words, according to historical experiences, religious factors had always been used in mobilizing the masses and breaking the public opinion and directing it toward the intended purpose, and the imperialist powers are used to pave the way for diplomatic and political path, and in the nineteenth century in part due to the awakening of nations and independent states for illicit conception, Zionism was both necessary and essential. But this is the story! In Christianity the most effective flow in support of the idea of Zionism and the Zionist state of Israel was Protestantism, because the Catholic Church believed that God has expelled Jewish people from Palestine for the crucifixion of Christ and the issue of return mentioned in the Bible is related to their return from Babylon.
Catholic Church, despite revisions and adjustments that take to his vision of Jews, but also tough issue to the tribe maintained over the years. Basically, the Catholic Church with the Jewish enemy looked, because they betrayed Jesus Christ and invited him to disbelieve hence the Catholics, Jews, apostates, infidels, and were accused of killing Jesus Christ.
Therefore, Catholics do not have the least idea of what is known as the return of the Jews to Palestine; in their view, the start of Jesus’ invitation, their validity expired.
The same thing is mentioned in a book published in 1977 by Hierarchs Catholicism of Damascus issued, in which he has explained:
My fellow have forgotten that the Prophet Jesus Christ, after seven times cursing reading Old Testament scholars, rejected the commandments of the Torah with this decisive sentence: "Behold, your house shall be destroyed forever." Thus, Jesus' prophecy came true and biblical promise of the Holy Land abolished.
Even at the Zionist conference Pope revealed his opposition to the Zionist movement and Jewish immigration to Palestine; but the positions of the Catholic Church in feud with the Zionist movement did not last long, and underwent a lot of changes due to the political pressures and events of the twentieth century. Although Vatican in 1904 apposed with the Zionist movement and Jewish immigration to Palestine but in 1947 affirmed the UN resolution on triad division of Palestine and the internationalization of Quds and in 1948 adopted a neutral position to the establishment of the Zionist regime. Similarly, in 1956 went a step closer to Israel, and stressed on the common Jewish-Christian heritage.
In addition to that, in 1960, Pope John XXIII officially apologized for role that the Catholic Church had played in anti-Semitism! The second global gathering of Catholic churches (1962-1965) was a turning point in relations between the Vatican and the Jews and the Zionist regime, because in that conference it was announced that Christianity had been shaped in a Jewish environment and Jesus Christ and other prophets of Children of Israel had placed their invitation on the basis of Jewish ideology. It was at the same meeting that Jews were exonerated from killing Jesus Christ and crucifying him and were acquitted of responsibility for the murder and crucifixion of Jesus Christ of contemporary Jews!
Finally, in the mid-eighties, the Pope's new official statement was issued about the Jewish origin of Christ and in 1992 Pope John II published a book about the teachings of the Catholic Church, emphasizing the reliability of all components of the Old and New Testaments ( Torah and Gospel) from the Catholic Church point of view in page 99, with detailing the lineage of Jesus Christ linked him to the seed of the Jews, the son of Jacob, the prophets of Children of Israel, and thus attached Jesus Christ to the ultimate ancestor of Jews and called him a progeny of these people.
Over time, relations between the Vatican and Israel were still closer to the extent that in 1998, Vatican celebrated the fiftieth anniversary of the establishment of the Zionist regime! This Jewish ceremony was attended by Cardinal Cassidy the head of the Vatican and the Jewish Relations Committee and also with the Vatican's secretary of state companies and became Israel's ambassador to the Vatican and in March of that year with the release of an official document entitled Reflections on the case said that Christians are required crematorium that crematorium not be repeated!
He was the best Pope ever in the history of relations between Christians and Jews, because:
He was the first pope who visited the Jewish temple.
He was the first pope to visit a Jewish holy places.
He was the first pope to stand respectfully in front of the wailing wall of Jews.
And he was the first pope to have a dialogue with the Israeli authorities and speak of Israel as a state.
It was the position of the Catholic Church that during the approximately one hundred years had a 180 degree turn and referred to direct confrontation with the Jews and the Zionist movement as a partner. But the position of Protestants from the very start by Martin Luther was far milder than the Catholic Church. As stated briefly in the definitions of Protestantism, Luther brought many changes to the Christian beliefs one of which was the developments in the field of Jewish-Christian relations. Luther advertised the belief of referring to Bible as a source of pure ideology, created the orientation and specific attention to the Torah among his followers.
This bias in the minds of Protestants believe that there is an eternal relationship between Jews and Palestinians, based on the predictions of the Torah must return the Jews to Palestine. This approach led to the Protestant position for the return of the Jews to the Chinese context, while the Catholic Church and the Holy Bible as reliable Protestants considered sacred not discussed.
The role of Torah in inciting followers of Protestantism, especially the English ones to support the aspirations of the Jews, is clearly visible in the writings of Haim Weizmann, the Zionist leader, in the first half of the last century. He writes in the book entitled Trial and Error:
Great Britain supported Zionist movement since its foundation, and took the responsibility to realize its ultimate goals and announced its agreement with the replacement of deserted Palestine’s Aborigines by Jews in 1933. However, if it was not for the successive rebellions and revolutions of Arab Palestinians, those goals could be realized in the same year.
It may be asked why the UK supported Jews and what is the reason behind having prejudice for the realization of the aspirations of Jewish people? The answer is that the people of England, especially conservative English people over all nations are affected by the Torah. English commitment to the principles of honesty, is what our aspirations fulfilled. Because the faithful English man believes in what the Bible says about the return of the Jews to Palestine, and the Protestant Church of England has provided the greatest assistance to this end.
Protestant Christian Zionists or the followers of Protestantism believe that the re-emergence of the Prophet Jesus Christ (PBUH) depends on three incidents:
1. Formation of a Jewish state in Palestine.
Therefore, the establishment of Israel in 1948 was for all the Zionists Christians a great annunciation.
2. The occupation of Jerusalem.
According to this biblical sign, evangelical Zionists supported the occupation of Jerusalem in 1967.
3- Rebuilding Solomon's Temple
At present, all the excavations done below the walls of the Temple Mount are carried out under the pretext of finding the temple and building a Jewish temple on the ruins of the ancient temple. The cost of drilling which has started since 1970 is provided by the Israeli Ministry of Religious Affairs and is typically from the pockets of the people of America and funded by Christian Zionists.
The support of Christian Zionists which was religiously motivated continued to the time when Benjamin Netanyahu, the former Israeli prime minister who was the Permanent Representative of Israel to the United Nations between 1984-1988 at the General Assembly United Nations in February 1988 said: the letters and messages of the Christian Zionists and American English at the beginning of this century affected directly on the minds of political leaders of the day, such as Lloyd George, Arthur Balfour and Woodrow Wilson, and this would influence their thoughts so clear that however, the basic political and international context underpin the establishment of the Jewish state.
In his speech he added that: since ancient times we have had an excessive long-standing desire to return to the land of Israel. This dream with which we have lived for two thousand years, was realized by the Christian Zionists.
Perhaps the path to college and entering the letters of the Hebrew Bible printing in the sixteenth century had a greater impact from the translation of the Bible into English, which was issued in 1538 by Henry VIII of England, in changing the attitude Christians to is Jewish. Teaching Hebrew at the University of British and European governments left their important work, including as follows:
1. Preparing the ground for the acceptance of the Jewish interpretation of the Old Testament, especially the return of the Jews to Palestine in the future.
2. Convincing students and researchers that the word “Israel” in the texts of the Old Testament includes all Jews in the world.
3. Acceptance of Christ’s biblical interpretation, before the end of the life of the world and the return of Jews to Palestine as a necessary condition for this appearance.
Such impacts went so far that in many people the desire to withdraw from the Christian ethic and attitude and inclination to Jewish customs strengthened, and even some groups advanced so far and accepted the religion of Jews officially. And others who remained Christians, treated Jews emotionally and kindly.
With the entrance of the Torah to the educational system such beliefs became so effective that many thinkers and leaders of the world agreed with the idea of Returning of the Jews to Palestine among which we can refer to John Milton, English poet, also William Blake, John Locke, English philosopher and founder of the liberal thought, Isaac Newton discoverer of the law of gravity, Joseph Priestley, famous chemist and the discoverer of oxygen, Jean-Jacques Rousseau, Pascal, Immanuel Kant and others.
It is not useless to know at this time that many Christians proliferated the idea of the Zionist return, many Jews denied this issue and opposed it. According to the teachings of the Torah they considered themselves worthy of this displacement and awaited a step taken by God for their salvation; in other words, it can be said that many Jews themselves were among the last ones to join the Zionist idea, although such beliefs did not last long and with the emergence of new rabbis they were called into question and the Jews were at the forefront of the idea of returning to the Promised Land.
Basically, the idea of returning to the Zionists has been chosen as a criterion and the friends and foes in conjunction with nations and governments has become. If those of Cyrus, king of Persia, as he recalled that in 538 BC, according to the considerations that he deemed would boost Palestinian issued a decree that allowed the Jews to return to Jerusalem; in the same way, Napoleon, who in 1799 during a raid to rebuild Solomon's Temple in Jerusalem and Palestine to Jewish immigration to Palestine asserted their respected. This criterion is still the most value for the Zionists in their support person, party or government that is friendly to them, in a year.
Regarding the fact that the balance is in favor of colonial interests of the United States and the United States feels an obligation to support the Zionist movement, as long as other governments support this regime and agree with its position, supports them back, otherwise by the political influence it enjoys, especially in the economic sovereignty of countries will put pressure on them to lead them to their desired position. Of course, the Zionist influence in international organizations such as the United Nations and international economic institutions and the media should not be taken for granted. These relationship will be explained below.
With respect to what was said, to some extent we can infer the truth of integration of religion and policy towards the Zionist movement in the political life of countries like the United States and European countries. Because according to the principle of separation of religion and politics according to their claims, its being false can be obviously seen in the position of the United States and European countries regarding the Zionist regime typical regional policy is a combination of the two. Especially the United States of America is morally and legally obliged to have the support of Zionism knows from the beginning of independence with a commitment to Protestantism in the preamble of the constitution that the people of America to put under divine protection on their currencies slogan We trust in God on mapping and an elected president was obliged to take an oath on the Bible.
In order to provide a more crystal clear picture of influence of religion in American society it is better to have a brief reference to the educational centers affiliated to the church. Churches of the United States have hundreds of excellent institutes, colleges and universities in this country. In the academic year 1981-1982 the number of parochial schools affiliated with these churches was1978. On the other hand, while the number of daily religious schools in the academic year 1954-1955 did not exceed 123 and had only twelve thousand students, in 1980, the number of schools reached 18,000 schools and two million students.
One of the first famous universities in America established by church with the aim of developing religious education was Harvard University that was founded in 1636. Another one was Yale University which was founded in 1710 and held the same purpose. Other universities in the United States that have had a deep bond with the Church are American University, Georgetown University and the Catholic University all based in Washington. Dayton and Pilor universities in Texas, Emory University in Atlanta, Boston University and Denver University in Colorado, Duke University in North Carolina, etc.
Statistics show the greatest phenomenon in the astonishing publishing and sale of religious books in the United States. In 1797 a third of all books sold in the United States had been religious. In 1984, 37 million Americans expended about two billion dollars, for purchasing religious books!
The famous Christian Zionists in the United States who played a key role in the support of Israel are Jerry Falwell, Bishop Patrick Robertson, Bishop George Otis, Bishop Mike Evans, Bishop Jaime Suagert and Bishop Billy Graham.
Christian Zionists in order to have better influence and expand the scope of their propaganda in addition to the customary practices and adopting new ways of advertising and taking advantage of the possibilities of a new technology used a fresh method called television Church to promote their own programs. With this method, they make it possible for all people of all ages, even children, to participate in their programs and in this way prepare for them what exists in churches readily at their homes. In churches television program that runs in addition to figures of Christian Zionism diverse array of religious programs on an ongoing basis by the fundamentalist pastor of the more than one thousand eight hundred audiovisual media comes into force, in addition to the United States are available in many parts of the world.

Conclusion

Given all the things that was said in this paper and bearing in mind the importance of each of the factors that counted as a Zionist causes, it can be concluded that contrary to popular perception that Zionism is deemed to be the result of Judaism and Jews are its creators, in fact this movement emerged in the shadow of the interests of the colonial powers such as Britain, it was first introduced by non-Jewish Western elements, and after a while it was accepted gradually by Jews. After that, the idea was mixed by the non-Jewish Zionism on the one hand and political and religious Zionist Jews, on the other hand.
So in short, Zionism can be seen as the domination of minority colonialists who wanted to get rid of waste Jews in the West, as well as achieving their colonial goals in the Middle East and for this reason created a platform called. The minority of exploiters (who from past till now without having any adherence to particular religious, dominate the majority of people, even the western ones) were looking for a foothold in the strategic region of the Middle East and since the diaspora Jewish in Europe had many problems and were religiously motivated to migrate to Palestine, despite the opposition of a considerable number of believers in Judaism, decided to use the Jews as a tool to implement their colonial aims and in this way the context of the formation of a usurper Zionist in Palestine was created.