Difference between the language of Quran and the language of other holy books

We will study differences between the language of Quran and the language of holy books in this lesson that is the last matter of the area of the language of Quran.
Sometimes lack of the recognition of these cases causes that some persons judge about the language of all religions equally and consider the language of Quran as the language of the religion. Hence, it is necessary that distinctions between the language of Quran and the language of other religions and their books, especially holy books.

Differences between the language of Quran and the language of other holy books:

The language of Quran includes features that make it special from the language of other holy books (old and new eras) and all of holy books of the religions.
The most important differences between the language of Quran and the language of holy books include:

1. Difference in the inference of the divine messages (the talk of God or the talk of human):

Quran is the talk of God that has been descended to the prophet of the Islam through the angle of the messenger of God (Gabriel) and Gabriel and the prophet are not allowed to interfere in its pronunciation and meaning. Different verses of Quran refer to this matter.
إِنَّهُ لَقَوْلُ رَسُولٍ كَرِيمٍ * ذِي قُوَّةٍ عِندَ ذِي الْعَرْشِ مَكِينٍ ...؛ (1)
وَلَوْ تَقَوَّلَ عَلَيْنَا بَعْضَ الْأَقَاوِيلِ * لَأَخَذْنَا مِنْهُ بِالْيَمِينِ * ثُمَّ لَقَطَعْنَا مِنْهُ الْوَتِينَ (2)
However, holy books ( Turah and its accessories and Bible and its accessories) are not in this way, but the history is the Jewish and Christianity religions and writes among them have written them. Hence, several persons have reported the history of Hazrat Isa in different ways and have formed four Bibles, Merghes, Luqa, Matthew and Yuhena).
We can consider ten orders (the travel of exit, chapter 20), the matters of Bible such as the sentence descended from the sky in the time of the washing of Hazrat Isa (the Bible of Mathew; chapter 3; NO. 17) as a similar divine message to the divine message of Quran. But it is not claimed that most of their matters are the remarks of God, but some Christian writers such as Ayan Barbur claim that some parts of Turah Book was written hundred years after Hazrat Musa. Even the event of the decease, burying and funeral ceremony of Hazrat Musa has been expressed old era. It is claimed that these matters have been inspired to the writers of holy books.
Some contemporary writers write about this case '' in spite of traditional thought dominated in Jewish-Christian societies that consider recorded writings in old and new eras as the inspiration of God toward prophets and saints. These books are divine messages descended over Hazrat Musa and Hazrat Isa that include the history of Bani Israeil and their events that common persons have written them over a long time. Of course, these books include orders and religious customs of the prophets of Bani Israeil and in this way, they use religious value. Apart from the reality that selected Gospels as legal books, the deeds of messengers, the theses of Pules and their formality among tens Bibles in the fourth century recorded in old era, they include a specific feature and are influenced by the thought of Greek Pules and the old enemy of Christ and Christians (Galatians v 1 p 14) and are influenced by Afrayysm, Mithraism and Genovesi interests.
Although some try to prove the validity and the reliability of different books of old era, they know that this is a futile attempt and express that matters recorded in these books are not acceptable at all.
Conclusion: since there is difference between the divine message of Quran and the divine message of a holy book, the language of these two holy books is different as well because Quran is the remark of sagacious and wise God that is true and real without inner conflict and contrast. However, the matters of a holy book that are the remarks of sinful persons are influenced by the culture of darkness era and the mistakes of writers or reporters. Consequently, it is not necessary that they are based on reality and wisdom and they may include inner contrasts and contrasts. Hence, some persons introduce the language of the religion, in fact, the language of a holy book is intended, methodological and useless. One of contemporary writers writes about this case '' according to the fact that the holy books of old and new eras are the understanding, inference, interests and tastes of hundreds persons with different motivations and according to the dictionary of the holy book that has been written for a thousand and hundred years, hence, it is natural that these writings have a lot of contrasts.
On the other hand, it is observed that the content of these writings have a lot of conflicts in different cases a part from serious differences. For example, it is said in a book '' all of persons that follow the religion are cursed. No one in the presence of God is considered as a fair religion. Christ caused that Sharia did not curse us because he was cursed for our sake as it is written '' everyone that is hung is cursed (Galatians: v 3/ pp 10-13); '' the Sharia was through us in order to have us reach Christ, but when belief in God appeared, it was not through us any more'' (Galatians: v 3/ pp 24-25) and '' the Sharia is the source of sin and death'' (Rumian: v 3/ pp 7 -11 and p 20).
In other pages, the writer of the holy book, Mr. Pules, says
'' Hence, should we relate the verses of Sharia to false belief? But we should establish Sharia''. (Rumian: v 3/ p31); '' in conclusion, Sharia is holy and a holy, fair and good rule''. (Rumian: v 7/ p13) (3)

2. Difference in content:

Quran introduces God without any partners and children(4) and nothing is like him; (5) hence, God has no body and Quran introduces prophets and their followers as immaculate persons(6) . Moreover, Quran states true stories and distinguishes between prophets and votaries, poets, magicians(7) and … Prophets brought miracles in order to prove the validity of their matters. However, miracles are different from spells done by magicians. (8)
Quran is a miracle that summons rivals in each era(9) . Quran emphasizes on thinking and pondering over and over again, but the current holy book is not in this way. (10)
According to texts written by human, sometimes, God came to the earth with a material committee in an imaginary look and wrestled with his prophet and appeared in the thrice methodology, Ab, Ibn and Ruh Al-Ghodus, that is not understandable. (New era; Matthew p 19/ v 28, the second Garantians v 14 p 13; Kulosian p 16/ v 1; Abarian v 2 p 1) and sometimes, God appeared in body (the first Yuhenna pp 1-3).
In this kind of point of view, the prophets of God are common persons that are sinful, commit immoral actions and rape the female members of their families and the female members of other persons. (The travel of emerge v 20/ pp 20-27; v 19/ pp 30, 37, 38, 35, 49). It is common that they commit some sins such as conspiracy, lying and hypocrisy (the travel of emerge p 27; the second Samuel 11, 13 and 18; the early kings p 13; Ermia v 23 p 12; Ermia v 2 p 8). They sometimes curse each other and have prophetic mission (Merghes V 14/ p 71; Matthew v 16 p 19). Moreover, they have dark and disorganized record and murder and hurt a lot of persons. However, they achieve to revelation and gain prophetic mission at once (the deeds of prophets pp 7-9; Galatians v 1 p 14).
Miracle is a common approach in this point of view and it is said a supernatural and wonderful action that is done by magicians, priests, ascetics, astronomers and the doers of strange actions and they surprise people.
The existence of a lot of miracles in holy books represents that the nature of this event of God is Nasereh that it has special features such as the encouragement of the language of people( emerge v 11 pp 1-9); the cholera of herd ( exit v 9 pp 1-7), the change of the face of Hazrat Musa( exit v 24 p 29); the falling of the walls of Jericho( Joshua v 6 p 20).
The Christianity of Mohaghegh was based on the rejection wisdom from the beginning and Tertullian (150-230 A.D) expressed clearly '' I believe in it because it is a senseless and meaningless affair and Hamu expressed '' how is Ethene( the symbol of wisdom) related to Jerusalem ( the symbol of Christianity)?... and according to the point of view of scientists, '' faith in cross is the hanging of mind''.

Conclusion:

Since there are differences between the content of Quran and the content of holy books, the features of their language are different as well.
The language of the divine message of Quran is in line with nature and wisdom and God and his attributes do not need a symbolic language as a specific and general meaning and its stories are true and real not mythical and imaginary, but holy books have accepted these matters.