Jurisprudence and political representatives

In this paper, law and representation, literal meaning of the legal nature and terms of Quran, narrative and jurisprudence is examined and then to paid elements of delegation - which includes voice, definite and determined by the law and the legal conditions.
The selection criteria, such as age / wisdom / possession permissible and legal conditions (selected) - that he should with reason and maturity, and the intention is - and will continue to consider the obligations on behalf of the and the power of attorney or representation, the number of vector or not, and the possibility of a multiplicity of states will discuss.
Keywords: jurisprudence, political representation, legal representation.
Introduction
Scientists and science in a general division is divided into two types: 1. rational and natural sciences; 2. Science and traditional credit and in relation to the implications of this division as well. Subject of scientific terms and concepts, belonging to the field of credit concept. Therefore, many philosophical and intellectual rigor in this area here, but the key concept in this field, the concept of credit. In religious terms, credit holy legislator and concepts conventional credit, credit institutions are required, and the legal division of the concepts used and the sentences, the two facilities and a signature is added. So that the terms of the second division, signed the power of attorney and representation in areas not related to the ruling establishment and the ruling and non-devotional devotional divide. The concept of advocacy and representation, the concept of credit is signature and not obedience. It should be noted that the features that are available for the advocacy and representation, man should realize that these things philosophically, intellectually, facilities and devotional seen, but these are concepts of all human beings of political and social, and it isn’t thought for a particular geography, therefore, the concepts that aren’t very ideological, consensus and proximity to seeing further than other concepts.
Of course, dealing with legal representation and political representation could be much wider dimensions. It must be observed here that is necessary or permissible to contract law, and political representation, doesn’t harm the purpose of this article, because the purpose of approximation between legal representation and agency. Or as a means to differentiate between political representation and legal representation that can be allocated to independent research and other aspects such as Vekale Almgharn between the Jurisprudence Imam with the public and … that the author not to follow the all problem, but we are in this article, more to follow closely these two concepts in terms of concept and are the two pillars. Preliminary mentioned before the discussion is necessary. First, throughout this article, most of the issues that have brought the civil law, therefore, that the modern civil rights, firstly as to the legal presence shines, modern politics and law, as well as the presence shines rights. And that law and politics are very close together.
What do we mean by representation, the importance of legal and political representation. In many cases, the Jurisprudence and civil rights, personal and individual contracts if such requirements, in political representation - which is a social and political issue and for this reason, is very important - a fortiori it must be all those requirements. In jurisprudence and law anywhere in the transactions between the individual sentences, in many cases, can be negated and they apply to the political and social issues. In this paper, we studied the legal approach to political representation. And prevailing legal provisions. Further explanation is made for the individual. The author claims that constitute individuality and subjectivity, but the same could be true of those statements, therefore, in this paper, the number of clients and the number of lawyers will be possible.
Jurisprudence and political representation
Before addressing the issue, the concept and representation conceptually explain:
Jurisprudence: The word in the sense of understanding, and a deep understanding of the meaning of Quran verses and traditions. In other words, religious vision of the law say whether it is an insight into the fundamentals of religion, or religious branches. But the term "Feghh Ahkam" say, the knowledge of the evidence detailed Secondary religious orders.
Explaining the teachings of Islam on three types:
1. Opinions: and it matters to consider, such as the origin and resurrection and ...
2. Ethics: in matters that relate to the soul, and the spiritual character speaks, is called, like virtue and consent.
3. The provisions to regulations regarding human organs (do and don'ts) applies, jurisprudence, responsible for the expression of provisions, so the issue of jurisprudence, is religiously accountable actions, and in the jurisprudence on provisions duty (obligation, to respect. .) and the provisions deduction (accuracy - corruption, invalidity, etc.) are discussed.
Of course jurisprudence to different aspects of life. The multiplicity of aspects of life would be a lot of combined law, such as Aledareh law, jurisprudence alsiyasse - Iqtisad law, jurisprudence Alqza Alasrah law and … but jurisprudence use absolutely, give up the traditional jurisprudence that is the law.
Political representation
(I political representation)
Political representation refers to a mechanism for people to participate in the running of the society in which they live, through the election of their representatives provide. In modern political systems, elected representatives through free general election is possible. Thus, all people participate in all political decisions and choose their own representatives directly with everyone. But all the decision makers are the elected representatives of the people responsible. Such a system, a kind of democracy is that if the election is free and public participation in the election laws or conditions of freedom, including freedom of speech, right of assembly and right to participate in various organizations is achieved Thus, people can representative or party between two or more parties to choose their preferred representative. Such a system based on the system of political representation.
The role of elected representatives of the people from the beginning has been defined in two basic types:
A) When an elected representative, in choosing their position, only to cite personal trust, and any other condition of the electors in respect of the implementation of the agency's hasn’t been. In this case, his role as the people's trust. But if the representatives of the people according to their political promises is selected, and the people he has chosen to realize their own personal desires, his role is limited to the "people's representatives" is determined in the same things and when the boundaries that people have set for him, beyond, he will be accountable to the people.
The role of the trustee in which a representative due to their personal characteristics, trusted people and plenipotentiary isn’t directly linked to the idea of democracy, although such a relationship may exist. The agent maintains its value;
This means that the people placed in the hands of people who are more qualified than others and are trusted by most people. It is obvious that such beliefs can be represented in terms of positions and coalitions in parliament or at a new coalition founded.
But as representatives of the people in the real sense of the word with the ideas and theories of democracy, has a close relationship. In this case, the representative value of its own behalf and not just as a tool that can help it to work and solve problems quickly and more easily.
It is obvious that such a representative, the obligation reflect the opinions and demands of people claimed to have chosen him as their representative. In this case, the gap between expectations and performance demands of the people and their representatives, to be considered as a big problem.
It should be noted that the constitutions of most countries (including the West), on behalf of the trustee and the trust of the people, the first, is emphasized. But the emergence and evolution of political parties and free competition between them, especially in the West, the principles of representative in action is excluded. Thus, contrary to what the Constitution is a representative on the role of representatives, as trustee of the people, rather than their beliefs, more faithful to the principles and aspirations of the party to which they belong.
The concept of delegation, points that should be noted is that the philosophy of representation for the people to participate in running society provides, and both agencies, the public trustee or being elected, so it does not conflict with them that are retractable. Agents can have a close relationship with democracy and representation, not an end, but a tool that can help, tasks and solve problems quickly and more easily, so it represents for the people.
The most clear in the jurisprudence of jurisprudence that can contribute to the agency, the honorarium is jurisprudence. The modern concept of representation, the concept of legal representation, can be collected, why it is that the law and the gates of transactions and contracts, rather than the worship and obedience that can’t be nothing. Bob transactions, negated easily shines on,
And the definitions, to have power of attorney could be reached on this point. By definition, we are looking for absolute law, not to mention, as a lawyer, has a wide variety, such as the attorney of choice, individual advocacy, unilateral power of attorney, power of attorney to exchange, advocacy not deposal, counsel, legislative advocacy, public law, special law , representing hostility, law courts, the legal sale in settling legal representation in divorce law in worship, representation in the bill, the law of retaliation, attorney at trial, etc. are more than 48 types of law.
Legal nature
In relation to the law, definition of jurists come to us in the definition of the contract not being allowed to marry as well as necessary, as well as to the criteria that it is indeed on behalf of, mentioned. And in the contract and that it is permissible, not a jurist. He Tazkre Alfoghaha in the book under the law, which is legal fact, he writes:
A lawyer, a contract that has to proxy legitimate tenure
The late scholar first, the religions, seek legal representation to knowingly possess and as a general rule of law, everything that a person can be captured independently, it is true that it would be a lawyer and vice versa Photo will be, that everything a person doesn’t possess, or won’t be properly represented there in behalf of criteria and not be a lack of representation, not true, as the person who has power over purity, here's behalf won’t be rejected because behalf, the law won’t be accurate.
Before the deal due to legal legitimacy, it is appropriate to the nature of modern political representation and advocacy in the law compared. Late Naini (to invoke God’s blessing) believed that representation of assembly (the modern sense) or of the religious law, or at least absolute law, the affairs on behalf of another person who was seeking the same legal nature. In the beginning, legal representation in parliament may know that in this regard he writes:
"Laughable the appointment of the Board of Supervisors proof of compliance to the law
Religious and that of the tax which is an archetypical form turns out to spend on materials presented and the other a public joint that I appointed one but Allah, no one in the province, it is possible to adapt to religious law”
Late Naini further emphasized that law refers, including legal representation, verbal and customary. The verses to support his assertion such as this that its meaning is that God is enough for us in all aspect and he is the best defender and we do not have any person to defend us except God cites and concludes that:
"After the House of Representatives and the need for the appointment of members of the primary health, compliance or non-compliance to the Assembly of religious law but verbal dispute and the truth or allow refers Attorney ship In this regard, what effect canoeing another would be applied”
The group opposed the adaptation, the author believed that the nature of both is one, that is, both, there assignor and assigned and also acceptor that is the client and the lawyer and the lawyer. Insisting on political advocacy contrast has legal representation emphasis is no reason, therefore, if the definition that both have mentioned, we can be assured accuracy will be explicit. Imam legal definition says attorney, escrow until it is his life work to another, for him to do, or launch it matters to him is his life, he referred to.
Some members of the Assembly of Experts constitution, some members of assembly have interpreted to represent the people and said:
"When people who are elected to represent, the people's lawyer"
Imam Khomeini in his speech at the Islamic Consultative Assembly said that all Muslim are representative of the people. You will ..., especially in the post-revolution constitution, the legal approach on behalf seen Recommended. As a result, representatives of the legal honorarium for the study of nature are the same, as the number of legal, legitimate and possible, the number of clients is still the same. In the most controversial legal provisions focused on individual sentences, but political jurisprudence, focuses more on the social provisions. Thus, when the Social approach in terms of political jurisprudence, representing the study, we can be easily achieved equal representation of modern legal representatives. Or at least to realize the commonality between modern law and jurisprudence.
Legal legitimacy
The legitimacy of the law and allowed it to book tradition and consensus proved. The Qur'an, the words of God which says such as this that: right dervishes zakat and those who are inferior to him and charge the affaires on it, and those who act upon it, namely those who have tried it, and they gather and collect them to be awarded.
Allameh Helli has said in the book that permit operation on behalf sentence is as beneficiary and according to that, permit the inference that the law is not opposed to the idea, Allameh citing verse 19 of Surah al-Kahf and argues about it.
But traditions: the great traditions in this regard that one of the traditions, Arwa Bareghy is famous tradition, Sheikh Ansari's Makasib unauthorized discussion. The story of the Prophet brought, the Prophet (peace be upon him), give it to Arwa to buy sheep, Arwa after the merchandise, the transaction and then, instead of a sheep Arwa Two sheep in the path of wisdom and then one of the sheep to sell dinars, after one sheep and one dinar, the Prophet (peace be upon him) is that of a sheep and a delivery dinars Prophet (peace be upon him) and Prophet says that one dinar you, and that your sheep, then the Prophet (peace be upon him) asked about it and he defines that had been the end of the narrative, the story of the making of legal scholars Arwa work
Also known from Imam Sadiq (peace be upon him) as saying that anyone man to do the things a lawyer will be fixed so long as the client's lawyer, your lawyer will represent out. Allameh Helli after quoting traditions that permit representation and legitimacy of these traditions, uses and traditions, he is a consensus that says:
All nations have consensus at all times and allowing cities and the legitimacy of the law, because it is highly stimulating to the law, is it clear, because it isn’t possible that someone, all they will do their work, then it is inevitable that In some works the deputy and lawyer.
After the main legal basis, necessity and nature of life and social relations. On behalf in fact, a political and social necessity that leads to agents because people don’t have time for their country and territory of the areas of the country are thought to direct the will; consequently, no escape unless representatives of their choice. The executive branch, the president and the legislature, and representatives for the Experts and...
Elements of delegation
Each contract, the elements of such a sale, seller, buyer and contract (Sigheh) sale of organs is the meaning of the pillars, which are constituent parts of a contract to their consistency, so that if a not pillars, leads to corruption contract. Contract law as well as any contracts are elements that include voice, client, and consuls, not any of these actions will cause harm to contract law. All jurists like a jewel, the religions and Helli and others, are considered the pillars of contract law as mentioned above to have:
1. sigheh and conditions in Article 658 of the Civil Code provides that: "Advocacy, exigency and accepted on any word or deed that indicates that it is indeed"
The basis of offer and acceptance may want the Islamic jurists, especially jurists, as the Jewel says, is to "realize the power of attorney, must be positive evidence
Going to be a lawyer, like those who say, "and Caltach, which means you have power of attorney or Estanbatek, that you turned to his lieutenant ... or any verbal expression is close to the ... law sometimes act together is realized, so much so that he said: "You will be on sale, have your lawyer" and he sells. Speech said in the law of contract, valid for the term, because the contract when necessary, a special word isn’t valid, the contract permitted, a fortiori it won’t be valid.
It seems that allowed Maataveh here because when the marriage, or the sale - that contract is necessary - Maataveh may call it that, in the law - that marriage is permitted - a fortiori be permitted. In representation of the formula because the formula, once verbal and verbal, and once present. Even The time is fulfilled, the Foundation will accept nothing wrong with that, is the front exigency.
Conditions of delegation
A) Definite and, in this regard, the Javaher has come as follows:
"One of the provisions of the law, it is considered definite. In regard to any dispute has never seen or even both consensus and it was given. Then, if suspended in demanding conditions, such as when the Zaid or modern, isn’t true, and even some scholars have said the same is achieved if even they belonged, like those who say: "If the sun is you're my lawyer, but if the power of attorney seprate and capture delay is allowed, there is no disagreement on the issue of identity cards and even in Tazkerato Alfoghaha, and Almasalek come to the consensus that has been awarded, in addition to That means verses and traditions and all believers conditions also comes ...
The application of other religions also have discussed in detail in this regard, that in order to avoid prolongation of the Word of addressing them can be avoided. Some of them, like Abu Hanifah and Ahmad ibn Hanbal, the basic, have accepted the suspension of the contract of mandate. But Shafei, not to accept suspension.
B) Determining client Fihe: the law should be clear, that specifies that the law is absolute or conditional, under Article 660 of the Civil Code provides that: "the agency may
It is absolutely and for all of the client, or bound to a particular matter or matters "and in Article 661 adds:" If a law is absolute, only to manage the client's property "Normally, each agency is bound to a specific territory, as represented Assembly of Experts, which is responsible for leadership and oversight of Parliament, its own territory, which monitors government and spending laws and the like. The Javaher in this field writes: "One of the provisions of the law, it isn’t so obscures doubts about the legitimacy of the law in which it would have to determine the client without a lawyer you have to say. "Or say you have a lawyer to do my work. Or tell you in one of the matters relating to myself and I ... If absolutely lawyer, the lawyer who, without the descriptive note, so promise, such representation isn’t correct, but look jurists vote better, it is a legal right, as the biography and several other legal texts on this issue is clear, even at this point to dispute the Shiite middle haven’t.
2. Case attorney and conditions:
The law could ban anything that isn’t legal is. In fact, the law is what the client and the lawyer agreed that one lost and the other, accepts this assignment. The most important provisions of the law in the eyes of scholars include:
A) the power of attorney on behalf of something that has the ability to read the jewel of reflection in speaking Shiite parties, one to the conclusion that the license to practice law in all things, but it turns out that what this circle ... rule out the diagnosis of such matters, it is the intention of the legislator on duty were paid directly to it, and this in the text by consensus and expressed ... and measure the things that can be law Thus, it is the intention of the legislator don’t belong isn’t bound by its direct ... like a variety of functions such as bill of sale and the price, payment, annulment, proof of cucumber, termination, peace, mortgage, transfer, custody, liability company, legal, loan, getting to survivorship, release, deposit, distribution of donations received and paid it, and marriage and its functions, such as assigning fault Mehr and termination, dismissal, divorce and ... Represent the opinion of those things that could be considered advocacy. And the determination of its territory, there is no prohibition and intellectual traditions. The legal criteria, is advocacy and representation of the law is possible. In this context, it is no problem. Anyone who is familiar with the rules of transactions in the legal culture and to know that most of the religious rules, signatures isn’t established with regard to the abolition of worship on the property and easy to tolerate, no is no room for doubt remain Whether the representatives of the law could be considered or not, it is true that the Quran and traditions, not as modern representation and to mention and not mention turns out that not to happen, but we can from the public and predications of the modern representation of the Advocacy accept. Topics like the experience that many of today's trading has been in the past, but scholars with the public and predications trading, trading new export orders.
A) the law is clear: the purpose of this provision, the law isn’t ambiguous at Javaher said, "One of the things that the client Fihe condition, it is clear that in some way."
It is clear that the discussions prior to the vote of the majority of scholars and even many agree, but need to transport their votes in the Word is that prorogation isn’t. And in article 660 of the civil rights that have already been quoted, in a reference to the power of attorney was given. The fact that the law should be clear, it is that the area isn’t known, occur uncertain. The agency, there are certain instances specified in the Constitution that each territory has, therefore, chosen selector and know what is being represented.
C) the representation of the client is the owner of the Javaher in this regard writes: One of the things that the client is Fihe condition, which is owned client. This provision is consensus among Shiite scholars.
None of religious jurists have different opinions about this condition and only some jurists have also added another condition: for example, the client Fihe should be permissible, one can also eat other law that in his place However, the extent permissible don’t remain always and in many cases, such as mining, discovery
Javaher and financial aspects. Hanifa believes in this assumption, representing not just a lawyer, but what he won, he would, on the contrary, another group of jurists and in particular, Shafeiiyeh believe that the law in such matters, That's right.
In the representation, the representative democracies is democracy and citizens' rights And free choice, because it isn’t from the other and is owned by choice, as a result, agency, no legal objection to conditions and easily, on behalf of the legal requirements can also be met.
3-picker (client) and conditions: client, who is something of the lost and chosen, and the client is a legal contract requires, under the law include:
1.Maturity and wisdom: the late Sabzevari writes the client's condition, mature and have a sense of perfection and what they will be allowed possession settling; so Sabi law, isn’t correct. And represented a madman isn’t correct.
Importantly, in the late Sabzevari, if perfection is wisdom. In an individual contract between the two sides is closed, should the client have the perfection of reason, but in representing the kind of a collective agreement, a fortiori, the electors shall be the fullest sense and therefore should be the reason tied and on the rationality of the ruling elite and the media. Rationality in all contracts and contract law stresses not tolerate insane. Representation in fact, of the collective wisdom, so candidates have the heavy responsibility of their wisdom and rationality and flowing, not the absurd and unfounded feelings and...
2. It is allowed possession: Under this provision, advocacy for children, whether point or non-point may not be correct, and the difference isn’t that the child is allowed or not he is and what a crazy insane starters and legal periodicals, not true, Javaher said: "In this regard, there is no disagreement and difficulty and even the apparent consensus of the scholars on this matter were paid as if madness after settling has occurred, the law is void.
First Martyr says that the right to possess doesn’t matter who is to property, or to provinces.
Imam "Khomeini", the client is allowed to condition, maturity, wisdom, planning, and allowed permissible, and the settling as nerve, insane, departure and obsolete is rejected.
As a result, we can’t force the power, wealth and other tools, selector certain to be forced to choose, but must provide the client with integrity and intent, the lawyer of their choice, therefore, in view of jurists, the client must be sane, permissible allowed, messenger and be autonomous in its behalf is true. Article 662 refers to the last condition, "his lawyer that his client should it be able to bring it to fit ...
In The agency the elected representatives should be mentioned criteria and these conditions can choose their own lawyer. This is the view of jurisprudence on religious law, Even as the political representative of 18 years or more of age may know, but it doesn’t have anything to do with jurisprudence. But respecting the law of such an agreement, but the law itself, a condition known as male and female puberty, maturity is determined. Nevertheless, we must be wise and rational as well. In fact, with maturity comes wisdom.
4. Attorney (elected or representative) and the conditions of the definition of the law already passed. Lawyer, who the client is, or to assign tasks and contract law, role, and is one of the pillars of contract law, as passed. See conditions of jurists are:
1. Wisdom and maturity: As the client, wisdom and maturity prevailed, the lawyer is also provided. Javaher writes. "The lawyer, maturity of reason, without any forms of disagreement is required, therefore, represent children - except in cases of known - and not just ... crazy.
Mature lawyer or infidel or apostate rebellious wise though, right (be careful). Therefore, if a Muslim apostate, the law isn’t wrong ... but justice and attorney in marriage, without disagreement and difficulty of We Shiite jurists isn’t required, in contrast to vote on their version of justice if some Shafeiiyeh know that the weakness of the vote, no doubt. Incapacitated due to wastage or bankruptcy law against Field
... In this regard, there is no dispute and the forms that it is permissible for a woman to divorce her husband and others to be represented or visit others. In this regard the Shiite scholars, there is no consensus both consensus even gone as intended, and...
This is the javaher in the law, Islamism, justice, faith, and doesn’t know the condition. Justice in Imamate condition, not in advocacy and representation. Some advocacy against their behalf. It seems that is not true, because in some definitions, between representation and advocacy on behalf of concomitant believe that wherever possible, the representation will be accurate.
Invalidity and Islamic justice because they don’t have reason for esteem and law, not a more common law not tolerate any hard decision, to Imam Khomeini in Tahrir Al-Vassileh like the Javaher that says, "isn’t a condition that the lawyer, Muslim , and then pagan lawyer, but an innate apostate is however the true Muslims and infidels, except in the case of occurrence of the infidel, isn’t correct, such as buying a book (Quran) and as vindication of the right of Muslims to reject or conflict of He, however, to be a Muslim. Lawyer who for foolishness or lack of money, is incapacitated, the person who isn’t a briquette to him, it is true.
Other conditions that often arises in the form of faction and party because of bullying, conditions resulting from the formation, nothing to do with justice and Islamic law, and that isn’t required because they don’t have proof of legal sources of credit that was too late Fazel Lankarani Because of the length Tahrir Alvasileh , as is written, stipulates.
2. The intention of the Imam Khomeini As we passed the following client requirements, and the plan also considers the conditions lawyer says, "and the lawyer, intellectual and religious conditions that have established themselves in what is Find a lawyer do, the lawyer for Muharram, in which what isn’t permitted, it isn’t correct, such as hunting and kept buying it and actually making the marriage, In fact, this is a discussion of the limitations lawyer who owns Javaher as well:
"His lawyer must be in possession of what appeared to leave him or have clearly slowed and the common law, it is considered permitted, open stands, so that if he
Data representing the commodity, such as a lawyer dinars and to sell on credit, it will sell two dinars criticism, it is true, and if it is one dinar and sell cash....
Representation and legal obligations
Iodine lawyer, is safe; thus, as long as there is no fault, no responsibility isn’t his. The Agent, the clients, bound and should be accountable. In fact, the people are represented, as are the civil law, and possession of attorney must be in line with the interests and the interest of the client.
Article 666 of the Civil Code: If the fault of the lawyer, damage to client understand the mystics lawyer, is its cause, will be responsible.
In addition, Article 667: lawyer should occupations and actions, respect the interests of the client and what the client explicitly authorized by him or by evidence and common law into his own, doesn’t exceed.
Tahrir Al-Vassileh Imam writes:
"Counsel should only what is in contract law as the law explicitly mentioned and apparently satisfied."
And said delegates should always consider the interest and the interest of the people and his comments and decisions on the scope of the rights and the interests of their clients. He can’t express his personal opinion and if the decisions for his own benefit and the benefit is null and void. As a practical benefit if the client didn’t mention the legal influence the action, stop the client's consent. (40)
In modern discussions of the question, is whether the representatives of assembly are obliged to fulfill their promises? Or on the instructions of their clients? Stuart Mill wrote: "Is there a Member of Parliament should be bound by the orders of their clients? Whether he should tell the views and reflect them in their control? Whether a parliamentarian as an ambassador or envoy resourceful people who can’t only work on their part, but
Can be considered that their interests are. The theory on the role of the legislator in representative government, and each has its fans, regulations adopted by some governments of choice. In the united provinces of the Netherlands, members of the Congress Centre, just as they are sent, and these regulations so that when you plan any major problem in the instructions received from them isn’t foreseen, representatives should be just as an ambassador to the Government See your will, to visit their clients. The other-which has an elected government in the UK and most countries have law and custom dictate that a parliamentarian to vote according to what he thinks is right, act and to every level of the comments different clients, and the importance of the not ..., such as the debate has shown us that many of the contracts, a matter of international and human.
The number of representatives (lawyers)
It may be said that, for example, numerous members of parliament should be noted that one or several of the lawyers prejudice to contract law and not on the nature of representation, as in the Civil Code and Shiite, before it is sealed.
Article 669 of the Civil Code reads: If for one of the two or more persons are appointed lawyer, none of them without the other can’t seem involved in it, but the fact that each is independently represented, in this case, Each can be used alone, it has to be here.
This is the illusion that this is legal and not related to the agency. As we have already passed the purpose of representation, a matter that is broad, ranging from legal, political and so on. It is important that the nature of legal and legal representation and legal counsel is consistent with multiplicity. As shown in Javaher:
If someone, for example, two lawyers to do so, if the community has provided each of them, none of them alone can do no possession, although legal in hostilities, and if for one of those conditions, it one will have the right to seize the individual. There is no disagreement on this issue and bug ... It seems that as the number of a lawyer is permitted, the number of clients is also permissible, as
That all citizens in the elections, some of the unit or on the affairs of their lawyer, because there is no reason for the prohibition of traditional and rational. And the lawyer for the two, depending on the laws of each country.
CONCLUSIONS
The concept of political representation and legal representation would be in line with the vision and it seems that the political representation of the book can be studied jurisprudence honorarium serious contract and to the concluded that in terms of the nature, to do with each differ much. In both, there is offer and acceptance. In both, selection and are selected. Also in terms of the pillars, one is the difference between legal representations and there is a definite contrast to the dignity that immobilized the two groups, the legal and legitimate proxy could also be argued in the Quran, in the way of living of Prophet and in the consensus, so that scholars have argued. If you have seen the initial difference can be negated, they saw the same terms, hasn’t been tough enough in jurisprudence. It can be used to represent any country that has a special condition that the forgery jurisprudence respecting them, but in terms of jurisprudence, Islam, justice, faith, and of such as there. It seems that the number of lawyer and client is as smooth as the reason for banning the proliferation, either as a lawyer or the client doesn’t exist.