Jews and collapse of children of Israel (2)

The authors of the Jewish Encyclopedia that strongly show empathy with Isabelle and "Phoenician neighbors”, call Aylya the prophet as "extremism" that unconditionally was opposed to any form of worship, except the Lord." According to them, Isabel had no objection to worship of God; on the contrary, it was Elijah who stubbornly opposed with religious rituals and beliefs of the neighbors (Phoenician). Thus, the royal family opposed with his statements, because his policy was the expansion of economic ties with neighbors, especially with Tyre.
Ahab was faithful to religious beliefs of his people, but did not see any harm to behave with tolerance toward religion of Tyre people and build a place to worship in Samaria for close circles to the Queen Isabel. But Elijah believed that his people’s historic mission is the maintaining of purely religious worship within its borders and not to recognize other gods as God... by the command of Elijah some people were provoked and invaded and the prophets of Baal were killed. King [Ahab] did not show any opposition to what Elijah did, but Queen Isabel came to wrath of killing the prophets of Baal and began a bloody war against Elijah and his followers... Elijah was forced to flee into the wilderness, because the people did not support him. .. There, like the story of Moses on Mount Sinai, God appeared to him ... and since people did not support him in the battle with the Isabel ... Hazael, next King of Syria, and Jehu, next king of Israel, and Elisha, Elijah's successor, were appointed as instruments of divine punishment.
It is astounding, but we should believe that the myths of the "Old Testament" do not belong to the distant past; the phenomenon is quite alive. This is the same authority that had previously obtained a negative image of Jeroboam the son of Nabat, because according to Jewish narrators of "Old Testament", he had built "Bat House" in Samaria. Why is he sentenced on the same charges as Jeroboam and Ahab will be strongly defended? Discovering the secret is not difficult. "Jehovah" is a pretext and sole criterion of bias even till today is relations with the Jewish oligarchs. Jeroboam and the "house of Joseph" were condemned, because they rebelled on this focus, and Ahab and "family of Omari" were accepted, because they had a strong connection with the oligarchs. This totally biased approach indicates that the presence of a three thousand year-old myth that takes its soul and lifeblood of the "Jewish racism".
After the revolution of Samaria and murder of Ahaziah, king of Judah, in Jerusalem, the bloody events occurred as well. Athaliah, mother of Ahaziah, took to the coup and by the killing of other members of the "house of David", but a child who was hidden by a woman, seized the power completely. Athaliah ruled for six years with the authority all over the Jewish state, and then, probably because of too much power of Phoenician priests in her court, dealt with Jewish priests’ opposition. Finally, they killed Athaliah in a measured coup, and the only survivor of the "House of David" sat on the throne.
In the seventeenth century, the story of Athaliah reflects largely in new art and literature of Europe. Jean Racine wrote his famous tragedy Otlyeh, and famous pieces were composed of the same name, and Antoine Kuypel drew his famous oil painting called "The Fall of Athaliah" which is kept in the Paris museum of Louvre. The theme of all these works is praising the "house of David".
In reviewing the events of this period, again archaeological data come to help the narratives of "Old Testament” and the name of the rulers of Israel are found in an inscription. At this time, Ephraim state is tributary of the Assyrian empire. In inscriptions of Shalmaneser III, there is a motif that shows Jehu bin Namashy, king of Ephraim, presenting tribute to Assyria Empire. In this inscription King Ephraim is used as "Jehu of the house of Hamry". Jehu’s assignment to Hamry family (Omari) means his headship over the state which is called in the name of this family’s reputation. This is the second time that a name of Israel's ruler is found in the inscription, first of Ahab and then Jehu.
About the engraved inscription of Shalmaneser III two points are important. First, not mentioning the name of "Israel"; second, the absence of the name of Jews’ King which does not mean that Jews were not the vassal of Assyria, but it means that the Jewish state did not have outweigh and importance, and its tribute was presented by King Ephraim. The inscription is not in favor of the "Old Testament", and it reduces the value of an important part of its historical narratives to Court history writing of a small and bragging state.
Jehu dynasty ruled 93 years (748-841) over the Ephraim country. Assyrian inscriptions during all eras of reign of the house of Jehu talk about Ephraim’s state as tributary of the Assyrian empire, and there is no name of the Jewish state and the "House of David" in the middle. And we should add that in the third cylinder inscription of Ed Neary III, king of Assyria (783-810), the king Ephraim is mentioned as "King of Samaria".
Throughout all these ears, Jewish hatred and hostility against the Ephraim government continue, and they are reflected in the "Old Testament" as horrible curses and promises of punishment repeatedly. However, the government of Ephraim is the superior power. Around the year 800 BC, the Jews started fighting against the Ephraim government that ends with a humiliating defeating of them. Jerusalem was occupied by king Ephraim, and its fence is destroyed by Afrayymyan. Finally, in 748 the government of house of Jehu collapses, and consecutive civil wars and coups fill Ephraim country.
At a time when the government of Ephraim is experiencing hard time of internal collapse and conflict, the authority of Assyria throughout the Middle East is expanding. In 745 Tyglet Pileser III came to power in the kingdom of Assyria and founded a vast empire as an expansionist and bloody king.
Ten years after the climb of Tyglet Pileser, one of the commanders of Ephraim’s state named Phacee the son of Romelia seized political power in the country. Phacee in alliance with Rezin, Aramic king of Damascus, began the policy of non-compliance and opposition with the expansion of the Assyrian empire. At the same time, Ahaz, the new king of the Jews (727-735), took advantage of the opportunity and showed himself as a rule-abiding and tributary ruler to expansionist Assyria Emperor. Since 734, in the cylinder inscription, the Assyria Empire for the first time appears with the name of the Jewish state, and Tyglet Pileser names Ahaz as his tributary. This is an important event and shows that the Jewish aristocracy through the betrayal of two Aramic governments of Damascus and Israel in Samaria could be close to the kings of Assyria. In this list, the name of King of the Jews is next to seven other small kings in Palestine and Jordan, and the name of the governments of Damascus and Ephraim are not mentioned.
It is in such an atmosphere that the bloody conspiracy of king and Jewish aristocracy begins against the governments of Damascus and Samaria. Both Jewish narrators of "Old Testament" and the new Jewish historiography are trying to express this untenable conspiracy of the Jews’ King as a defensive operation. Historians of the Hebrew University of Jerusalem write: heads of the governments of Damascus and Samaria began a conspiracy to overthrow the "house of David" and the establishment of another house in Jerusalem, and "in such a desperate situation", Ahaz asked Tyglet Pileser for help.
Narrative of the Jewish framers of the "Old Testament" is as follows:
And the house of David was told and said that Aram had encamped in Ephraim, and his heart and the hearts of his people trembled so that the wind shakes the trees in woods. Then God told Isaiah you go to meet Ahaz and say to him... take care and be quiet. Do not be afraid, and do not feel weak ... because Aram has consulted with Ephraim and the son of Romelia in opposite of your favor and say to raise agaist Judah say surround it and conquer it for ourselves, and appoint the son of Tabyyl as the king. Yahova God says: it is not realistic and would not be fulfilled, because the secret of Aram is Damascus and the Damascus’ secret is Rezin, and after sixty-five years Ephraim will be broken, so that there would be no other tribe anymore, and the head of Ephraim is Samaria, and the head of Samaria is the son of Romelia; God will bring you and your people and upon the family of your father the days that have never come since the days that Ephraim separated from Judah, the king of Assyria. And in that day it will occur that Lord will blow in pipe for the flies that land on the banks of the rivers of Egypt and for the bees that are in the land of Assyria, and all of them will go up and will be landing on the valley and rocky crevices and all the thorny bushes and on all pastures. On that day the LORD will shave his head and feet’s hair and his beard by middling of Supreme hired from beyond the river, which means by help of the king of Assyria.
This is a horrifying destiny that "God of Israel" draws in support of the "house of David" and the Jewish aristocracy for Aramic people of Syrian and the ten tribes of Israel. In the "divine mission", the bloody king of Assyria is the only tool of revelation of divine wrath.
In the "Old Testament" there is another version as well. In this narrative, the tragic fate of the people of Damascus, the joint victims of the conspiracy of Jews and of the king of Assyria, is clearly pictured:
Ahaz sent messengers to Tiglath-pileser [Tyglet Pileser], king of Assyria, and said I am your servant and your son, so raise and help me run from the hand of the Aramic king and of the king of Israel who have risen up against me. Ahaz got silver and gold that were found in the house of the Lord and in the treasuries house of the king and send them as offering to the king of Assyria. So the king of Assyria hearkened to him. And the king of Assyria went up to Damascus and took it, and took its people as captive to Qir and killed Rezin.
In this narrative, Ahaz is not only a heathen, but changes "Temple of Solomon" to the Assyrians pagoda to please his lord, the king of the Assyria:
And King Ahaz went to Damascus to meet Tiglath-pileser, king of Assyria, and saw the altar in Damascus. And Ahaz king sent like alter and its form based on all its industry to the priest Avrya, and Avrya the priest built an alter just like what King Ahaz had sent from Damascus. And when the king came from Damascus, the king saw the altar, and the king came near the altar to offer a sacrifice...
Thus, with the bloody intrigues of the Shah and the Jewish aristocracy, in 732 BC, King was assassinated in Damascus, the Syrian people went into captivity and independence of Aramid state of Damascus was ended. Now it is the turn of ten tribes of the children of Israel.
We do not know what happened that three years later Phacee was murdered by one of the leaders of Israel named Hosea ben Elah. It is likely that he is the victim of a joint conspiracy of Jews and Assyrians. Hosea, Ephraim state's new governor, later became tributary of king of Assyria. However, this situation did not last long. In 720 BC, during the reign of Sargon II, King of Assyria (721-705), the Assyrians attacked Ephraim’s satate, and its existence terminated. "Old Testament” has described the story of the Assyrian invasion to land of the ten northern tribes of Israel as follows:
Hosea ben Elah did what was evil in the sight of God ... but the king of Assyria found treachery in Hoshea, because he had sent messengers to the king of Egypt and did not send presents to the king of Assyria like every year, so the king of Assyria arrested him and put him in prison. And the king of Assyria invaded the whole land, and went up to Samaria and besieged it for three years ... the king of Assyria took Samaria and carried Israel away as captive to Assyria and let them live in Halh and Habor on the Gozan river in and in the cities of the Medes.
The sin of the ten tribes of Israel was failing to Jewish aristocracy and this is "the great sin of the house of Joseph" that should be punished severely.
So the Lord have forsaken all the offspring of Israel, and he humbled them and gave them to looting participants... because he created Israel from the house of David, and they appointed Jeroboam Nabat as king of Israel; and Jeroboam made Israel commit a great sin.
And to this crime, inhabitants of the land of Ephraim had such a fate:
So Israel left their land from to Assyria to this day. And the king of Assyria let people of Babylon and Côte and Hamath and Sepharvaim to settle in and put them in the cities Samaria instead of the children of Israel. And they occupied Samaria and were living in its cities.
According to the Assyrian inscriptions, Sargon moved only 27 290 people of the Ephraim country's inhabitants to the eastern territories of the Assyria’s state. It is clear that this cannot be the whole population of ten northern tribes of Israel. So, certainly the ten northern tribes were not destroyed. An important part of them settled in the land of the Jews, gradually lost their tribal identity and were absorbed in a new set called "Jews". Contents of the "Old Testament", especially "The Book of Jeremiah the prophet" (contemporary with the occupation of Jerusalem by Nebuchadnezzar), is supporting the idea. In one instance, we see residents in the Ephraim country that desperately demanded of Jews taking refuge in their territory and eventually the request will be accepted by disgraced and humiliated manner:
I heard Ephraim mourning for him and was saying you punished me and I was chastened, like calves which have not been experienced. Return me so that I will be returned, for you are my God. Indeed, after I was turned I was sorry and regretful, and I hit on my thigh when I was training. I was put to shame and disgraced my time ... So, God said ... Verily I shall pity for him.
And we know that many of them were captured as slaves for Jewish aristocracy. The concepts of "Hebrew servant" and " Ebranyeh’s slave ", which later made detailed discussion in Talmudic jurisprudence called " Hebrew Abdul ", from this era finds its way to the "Old Testament". For example, during the siege of Jerusalem by Nebuchadnezzar, Zedekiah, king of Judah, to attract the sympathy of the people of the city ordered the release of "Hebrew slaves": "Everyone releases your Hebrew servant and your Ebranyeh’s servant”. This shows that at this time many Jewish residents of Jerusalem have had “Hebrew slaves” in their homes.
This is the end of a long period of the history of Israel, which begins with envy of Joseph’s brothers, led by Judah, and it ends with the tragedy of 720 BC and complete destruction of the country of Ephraim. The index of this long period is competition between two tribes of Ephraim (house of Joseph) and Judah; whatever the Jewish narrators of "Old Testament" have described as “Ephraim’s envy for Judah and Judah’s enmity with Ephraim". With the complete destruction of Ephraim, Jews’ pure domination period begins; gradually Jewish tribe with all of Israel is called as one word, and eventually "Jewish" name is replaced by "Israel" name.
Bloody and inglorious end of ten tribes living in the country of Ephraim later became the stuff of myth of “ten lost tribes of Israel" and placed on the basis of "the myth of displacement" which was the foundation of a new Jewish culture and ethnic psychology.
This myth is based on three predictions that have been stated in the new "Old Testament", which belongs to the period after the destruction of Ephraim:
In "The Book of Isaiah the prophet ", which is attributed to the second half of the eighth century BC, just after the destruction of Ephraim, the "apocalypse" is mapped out this way:
And in that day, it will happen that the Lord once again stretched out his hand to gather together the rest of his people from Assyria, Egypt, Ethiopia, Elam, Shinar, Hama and the islands of the sea. And will raise them in direction of scientific communities and will gather the outcasts of Israel. And he will provide dispersed of Judah from the four corners of the world... and will jump on the west on the shoulders of the Palestinians, and will plunder the children of the east.
In "The Book of Jeremiah the prophet", which is attributed to the sixth century BC, we read:
We will watch a day that scout of Ephraim Mount will call to rise up and go to Zion next to the Lord, their God. Because the Lord said: to Jacob sing for joy and sing for joy over the head of nations... and say, O Lord, save the rest of Israel, your people,... for I am the father to Israel, and Ephraim is my firstborn.
And finally, in the "Book of Ezekiel", which is attributed to the late sixth century BC, both the duality and conflict of the house of Joseph and Judah and promise of return of "lost tribes" are described in a more clear way:
Son of man, take one stick and write on it, For Judah and for all Israel, his comrades. Then take another stick and write on it, For Joseph, the stick of Ephraim and all the house of Israel, his comrades. And make them one stick for yourself with each other and join them so that you will have one stick in your hand... then tell them Lord says this. Now I will take the stick of Joseph which is in hands of Ephraim and I will have tribes of Israel who are his friends and will gather them with Judah’s stick and make them have one same stick. Now I will gather children of Israel from all nations they have been among them and will return them to their Land. And I will make them all as one nation to be on lands of Israel’s mountains, and one king will rule over them, and they would not be two nations any more….and my creature, David, will be their king and will be a guide for all of them…and my creature, David will be their head till the last day of the Earth.
Isaiah and Jeremiah’s narratives is reflect of the " Ephraim nostalgia " among the nations of the Jewish state in two centuries after the destruction of Ephraim’s government; and it could be the story of ten northern tribes’ survivors’ suffer that are now under the domination of Jewish aristocracy and wish their "golden era" to be returned. In these narratives, "Ephraim" is dear of Jacob, and the promise of "Jehovah" is to delight this old man that does miss Ephraim so much. The two narratives are not in favor of Jews.
This prediction of Isaiah which promises the unity of children of Israel with the West in the loot of East is obviously a new added part, and it is probably faked during the wars of Iran and Rome and even maybe during the Crusades and after them.
The two last cases of Ezekiel (24/37 and 25/37) dramatically have a huge Jewish background and are linked with the myth of the "House of David". In our view, a part of that in which " Ephraim nostalgia " is totally changed to a Jewish myth and puts it on the basis of global and eternal governance of "house of David", the Jewish oligarchs, is a completely new added part. This section belongs to the restoration of the iconic of "house of David" and forging of the "King David" (Rash Gluta), in the late second century AD. According to this Jewish narrative of the “Ephraim nostalgia ", "ten tribes" were not destroyed, but they migrated from their homeland, and they were displaced around the world and settled in unknown places. In this myth, the end of long period of homelessness of "ten tribes" and their appearance are the beginning of emergence of "Christ" (from the lineage of David) and the establishment of the World Jewish state.
The oldest evidence that we know of the use of "the myth of the lost ten tribes" in political endeavors of the Jews belongs to the late ninth century. At this time, a man named Eldad Dani claimed to belong to the tribe of Dan, and the tribes of Dan, Naphtali, Gad and Asher have independent rule in a land in Ethiopia and are against their Christian neighbors.
Since the fifteenth century the myth of "lost tribes of Israel" was revived by the Jewish oligarchs, and Christians were heavily influenced by it, and it became the ideology of European overseas expansion. The myth is based on a big lie from its foundation. Jewish aristocracy was the factor of destruction of "ten tribes of the North" and to realize it, spent a long period in intrigue and conflict. Finally, when their name did not exist anymore, it appeared in the role of heir to the great legacy of Ephraim: in the new historiography of Jews, all the honors of the Ephraim’s state were registered in the name of Jews, and in the new religious Jewish and Christian myths, oppression of ten tribes was looted in the name of "oppression of the Jewish people". Judaism foundation of its genesis is based on forgery and lies.