Jews, English and the beginning of a new era

According to the writings of the fourth Earl Lytton, in the nineteenth century, Great Britain Empire was ruled by a party that Gladstone has called them "ten thousands upwards". Within this category, there was a smaller group that the main levers of politics, economy and culture in British society and across the Empire of Great Britain were in its hands. This "inner group" was composed of families that through kinship ties as well as through special elite schools, especially high schools of Harvey and Eton and the universities of Oxford and Cambridge deeply interconnected with each other.
This is a picture of a political structure based on dynastic aristocracy (oligarchy) which has made the life of society of Britain in the last four centuries. This oligarchy was formed since the era of Elizabeth I (1558-1603) and in the peak of overseas rush, and in the seventeenth century became an independent entity from the British court and government, however, it usually was closely associated with it and began a strategic alliance with Jewish plutocracy oligarchy from the same period. Great Britain colonial oligarchy was the mix of aristocracy traditional English landowners that invested in overseas endeavors, who were adventurers and new bourgeoisie that in this way found an enormous wealth, and hiding and revealed Jews. The oligarchs in the eighteenth century reached a great wealth and power, and with such a situation stepped in the "Industrial Revolution" in nineteenth century.
Great Britain’s oligarchy and political parties
The structure since the late seventeenth century, from the reign of William Orange (William III), was organized mainly around the political groups of "Whig" and "Lace".
The meaning of the words of "Whig" and "Lace" are not clear. We only know that the first word has the origin of Scottish and the second term has an Irish root. In the seventeenth century, "Whig" was applied for fans of "Presbyterian" Church, from the Protestant sects, in Scotland. In the years 1679-1680 the name was applied to a group of MPs who opposed the Crown of Prince James, Duke of York, because he belonged to Catholicism. In the seventeenth century, the term "Lace" referred to a group of Irish rebels who were involved in killing and looting of English soldiers and settlers in Ireland. Later, supporters of the Pope and the Catholic monarchy of England were also named by this title. In the case of the Crown of Catholic Prince James, grouping of representatives of his supporters in Parliament, presumably from the opposition became popular to "lace". It should be noted that the origin of this conflict was economic and political, not religious. In the eighteenth century the "Lace" party did not belong to the Catholic faith and was known as a Protestant grouping. For example, Frank Bright, author of the four-volume History of England (1896), refers the group as "Protestant party".
Since the ascent of William Orange (1689), "The Whig oligarchy" was attributed to that part of the British aristocracy and bourgeoisie who overthrew James by the investments of the Amsterdam’s Jews and brought William Orange to the throne. According to Frank Bright: "Whigs brought William to the throne and expected him to act as their chairman of the party", but "William wanted the king of all nations of England not a particular party." This "non-partisan" policy of William became a tradition, and to this day, it has been the British court’s procedures for the two major political parties of the country. One of the reasons for the continuation of the monarchy in England, despite the political changes in the country, should be search in this procedure.
Category of "Whig" was the dominating power in politics in England to around half of the eighteenth century. During this period, about a hundred "lace" representatives in British Parliament formed the Opposite Group of the "Whig" and became an important political power. Thus, the "Lace oligarchs" also emerged along and against the "Whig oligarchy". "Whig oligarchs", was satisfied due to having decades of political and economic power superior to the "current status " was considered as a "traditionalist" force and supporter of the current political and international order and role. On the contrary, "Lace" was represents of the interests of a new colonial bourgeoisie which had risen in the late seventeenth and early eighteenth century and demanded a greater share of political power and was calling for the aggressive policy in the region and the world. In fact, in the eighteenth century, "Lace" was placed in the same position that a century ago "Whig oligarchy" was in it against the Catholic James II. Now, "Lace" was critic of "the current status" and was calling for change in it, and this time, they were the ones who raised slogans of "religious tolerance" in favor of greater participation with Jews. For example, Great Britain's East India Company was mainly established by businessmen linked to "the Whig", but Sir Josiah Child, the powerful chairman and "dictator" of company in the late seventeenth century, established "close links" with Lace.
The development of the parties in a new political structure attitude that today we know them as "political parties" lasted nearly a century. Early in the reign of George III (1760-1820) still "Whig oligarchy" as a "political party", in its modern sense, did not exist; the name was attributed to the powerful aristocratic groups and families who applied their influence through their links network. A Party called "Lace" also did not exist, and this name was attributed to the trends and traditions of certain social families and groups that acted harmonically. George III chose his ministers among his friends from both sides, and thus, a new grouping was formed which was known as the "Royal Party" or "the Court Side". However, in this era, competition and conflict of the two parties of "Whig" and "Lace" in politics and economics of the Great Britain finally gave them a systematic structure. In 1784, "Lace" was organized as a party and Junior William Pitt (1759-1806), Prime Minister, was recognized as the leader of the "Lace" party. "Whigs" led by Charles James Fox also (1749-1806) formed their own party.
The process of development and the rise of "political parties" in British society were formed on a whole lineage stem within the context of personal and political and financial conflicts of the mentioned two groups.
William Pitt Junior, grandson of Thomas Pitt, is the chairman of St George (Madras) Palace Fort and famous director of the East India Company of Great Britain.
Charles Fox, leader of the "Whig", also belonged to this oligarch. His father, Henry Fox (1705-1774), known as "Baron Holland", was not of the traditional aristocratic families of England and never achieved the title of "Earl". However, Baron Holland was considered as strong and very wealthy men of Britain, the chairman of the House of Commons, and the great main rival of William Pitt, the father of William Pitt Junior, and only because of his reluctance in personal conservatism, despite numerous opportunities facing him, he did not accept to be the head of state. Charles Fox due to his father's authority became a member of the House of Commons when he was 19 years and when he became 24 years, he became the Treasury Secretary. During this time he had to pay 130 thousand pounds sterling debt for losing in gambling which his father paid it. Charles Fox also like William Pitt belonged to "the Court" Pasty. He was a friend of George IV, and when he became the Foreign Minister in the state of the Duke of Portland (1783), promised prince to provide an annual income of one hundred thousand pounds for him.
In the late eighteenth and early nineteenth century, during America's War of Independence and the French Revolution and the invasion to the local governments of India, the William Pitt’s side were tough supporters of military intervention in North America and continental Europe and the Indian subcontinent, but Fox and hid supporting focuses were reluctant about the interventionist policies and even expressed no interest for the war with Napoleon as well. This part of the oligarchy of Great Britain was hopeful of the slave trade in the islands of West India, the main arena for their investment, and looked for more profits in this way. Thus, Charles Fox arose in favor of American independence since the year of 1774. Fox was opposed to an operation that since 1769 had just 600 thousand pounds cost for "secret services".
In 1788, the grouping of "Whig" in parliament led by Fox and Edmund Burke, in his struggle with William Pitt, were the flagship of combat with predatory operations of Warren Hastings in India, and they were the same people who accused Hastings of financial corruption and took him to the court. In contrast, in the same year, William Pitt in Parliament raised the banner of struggle against the slave trade. He spoke of "inhuman" of the slave trade and the suffering of these men and called for "Emancipation". The political exploitation of "Lace" (conservatives) from family ties of leaders of "Whig" (Liberal Party) with the slave trade in the West Indies continued in the following decades as well. In the study of Prime Minister Era of William Gladstone, leader of the Liberal Party, we will be more familiar with this phenomenon.
However, in the story of William Pitt’s conflict with the French Revolution and Napoleon, this conflict was repeated again. Fox opposed against warmongering policies of Pitt and became an admirer of the French Revolution and formed an opposition against Pitt as a defender of "liberalism" and "freedom of expression and thought" and "civil rights" in the United Kingdom. This is how Fox is recognized as the main architects of "liberalism" of the nineteenth century in Great Britain. As a result of these positions, a group of "Whigs" abandoned Fox to support William Pitt in 1791. Edmund Burke, tough opponent ideation of the French Revolution, placed at the head of this group, and thus the long friendship between these two leaders of the "Whig" finished.
In the period after the fall of Napoleon (1815) a party chaos was created in England and eventually around half of the nineteenth century, the "conservative" Robert Peel and Benjamin Disraeli and "liberalism" Lord John Russell and Gladstone emerged through it. From now on, the term "Lace" was applied for the "Conservative Party" members. By joining of "Whigs" to "Liberal Party", the party was also transformed as carrier of the aristocracy traditions of "Whig". As we see, finding any distinct "class status" for parties of "Whig" and "Lace" is inaccurate and misleading.
During this period, the Jewish plutocracy as a hidden and influential political power had its own independent interests. Jewish oligarchs based in the UK, depending on the time and the political and economic positions of leaders of these parties, had a close relationship with both parties. Jewish plutocracy had close ties with "Lace" (conservative) Pitt, Canning, Wellington, and Peel and also was close to "liberal" Russell and Palmerstone. On the contrary, in some cases, they had no relation with "Liberals" Gladstone or "conservative" Salisbury. However, on the eve of the nineteenth century, the Jewish plutocracy was known as an independent and influential transnational political, economic and cultural center of Europe in general and Britain in particular, and it was from the inside of this focus that the emergence of the phenomenon of the Rothschilds occurred.