Financial aristocracy and the Revolution of 1848 - 2

A German press writes Rothschild should consider this event as a serious warn. Engels means the book that George Mathew Dyrnvayl published in Paris under the name of
Saturday, October 8, 2016
Estimated time of study:
author: علی اکبر مظاهری
موارد بیشتر برای شما
Financial aristocracy and the Revolution of 1848 - 2
  Financial aristocracy and the Revolution of 1848  - 2

 

Translator: Zahra Zamanloo
Source: rasekhoon.net





 

A German press writes Rothschild should consider this event as a serious warn. Engels means the book that George Mathew Dyrnvayl published in Paris under the name of ‘’Rothschild, the first king of the Jews.’’ all unique reflects to this book shows the thirst of the people of France and Europe to be familiar with the facts that are directly linked to their fate. The impact of this book was great. The powerful Baron James Rothschild published an addition pamphlet to the statement that was made in the press, the booklet is also published in response to the book as ‘’the response of first Roth-schild, the King of the Jews to the last evil of king of liars.’’
In June 1847 Engels was a reporter for British newspaper of the Northern Star in Paris. He prepared there an essay called "The near Decline and fall of the Guizot, the French bourgeois state" which was published in paper number 3 in July 1848. In this article Engels has mentioned name of James Rothschild before Louis-Philippe and implicitly has named him as the main governor of France. In this article, he first describes the French political climate, and shocking revelations of widespread corruption at the level of senior government officials, including the prosecution of war crimes of Secretary General Kubiyeh bribery accused by taking bribery from a mining company. Among these cases, there are crimes like the sale of noble titles by Guizot and his colleagues with the amount of 80 thousand francs. Engel then reorganized and con-solidated the power of the big bourgeoisie of France after the Revolution of 1830 and occupied key positions in the econ-omy and politics in France by their short-term deals. Engels ends the article in this way: "Rothschild and Louis-Philippe, both of them, know well that acceptance of the smaller bourgeoisie in the House of Representatives has no meaning more than Lu Republic"!
The next hit of Engels with Rothschild is in September 1847. In his article, titled "German socialism in prose and verse" investigates the collection of poems by Carl Beck, the German poet. Carl Beck is one of the followers of sects of "real socialism" in Germany with whom Marx and Engels were in conflict as "petty-bourgeois socialists". Poems of Carl Beck, called Songs of a poor man, was published in German in November 1845 and it was confronted with a great welcome. The first poem of this collection is addressed to the Rothschild Foundation and part of it says:
I see your strong hand
That would hit me
- Until my blood can flow
But I read by the order of Lord and fearlessly
I read what I know freely
Engels criticizes the lyrics of Beck cruelly. Engels attacks to Beck that why his poetic allegory he has considered the "golden rule" to obey the "desires" of Rothschild. He concludes that Beck suffers from the "illusions in bourgeois” and he does not know the relationship between Rothschild power and social status". Engels calls the Lyrics of Beck as the “womanly cries," of a "humble man" that does not have any resemblance to the “arrogant, aggressive and revolutionary proletariat ". He accused Bak that he has not hurt the "Jewish Rothschild” with attributing Rothschild the title of "God", but he has enchanted young German by his power. Engels calls Beck's attack to Rothschild on the level of “rural stories" that is not similar to the offensive against the "power of money whose general representative is Rothschild ". Carl Beck, in this system, like Dyrnvayl, has described James Rothschild as the "King of the Jews": Jews elect Rothschild as the king because "his gold is heavier." Engels is angry that why Beck attributes the "power of the legendary" to Rothschild.
In January 1848, Engels, in an article titled "beginning of the end in Austria" analyzed the situation of this country during the authority of Metternich and inevitably he faced with the phenomenon of Rothschild. He points out the Metternich differences with Karl Mayer Rothschild, the head of the branch of the Rothschild Foundation in Naples and Frankfurt, and he reminds the unwillingness of the Austrian government to transfer its railway concession to the company of Rothschild and he adds:
Carl Rothschild can buy all the Austrian monarchy. We are pleased to see the victory of the bourgeoisie over the Austrian monarchy. We only wish that this really base really, really dirty and really Jewish bourgeoisie buys this respected empire. Such hateful, aggressive, patronizing and smelly Government is appropriate to be under the yoke of the really mean, abnormal and smelly enemy. After he soon ventured to pluck the tail of Metternich, every Metternich can be helped by us the [Communist] to fight with this enemy.
In February 1848, he wrote another article on the situation of Austria and talks about the begging of Metternich, the Aus-trian Chancellor, to the Salomon Mayer Rothschild and Rothschild's innovative response to their ruler. He then compares Nicholas I, the wealthy Tsar of Russia, with Rothschild, and he calls tsar as the "Rothschild of deteriorating despots kings" because of his financial assistance to the King of Prussia and his possible help to the chancellor of Austria.
The story is related to the independence wars of Italy against Austria, which was supported openly or hidey by the British colonial oligarchy and the Jewish plutocracy was practically among the front of London. Engels considers these events as the bourgeoisie and aristocracy. The socialist Engels, according to the pattern that later became known as the historical materialism, tends to the emerging bourgeoisie more than the aristocracy in decline. The bourgeoisie of Italy is on the eve of the victory and the seizure of political power and this is a failure for Austria and "Metternich, the follower". Metternich wants to defend the Old Italian by the military intervention. England protects "truly” from the Italian bourgeoisie. Engels approach toward the Britain's position is praiseworthy:
While other major powers, France and Russia, help as much as they can, the United Kingdom alone helps the movement of Italy. English bourgeoisie takes maximum advantage from the abolition of protective tariffs of Italy and Austria, and thus the establishment of tariffs against Austria in Italy. For this reason, he protects the Italian bourgeoisie, which then needs the free trade to grow and of course he will be united with the British bourgeoisie.
In this situation Austria tries to prepare military equipment to attack the Italy, but state treasury is empty and Metternich needs money. He asks help from Salomon Mayer Rothschild, the chairman of Rothschild Foundation in Vienna.
Rothschild replied that he did not tend to fight and so he could not give any money to support the war. In fact, whether there is a banking that gives his money to the rotten Austrian monarchy at a war in which a country like the United King-dom has participated? Thus Metternich can no longer count on the bourgeoisie, and therefore it has turned to the Emperor of Russia in recent years, thanks to the Ural and Altai mines and grain trade, it has turned to a big capitalism. Tsar of Russia has once helped Frederick William IV and gave him 15 million rubles silver, it seems that it becomes the Roth-schild of all deteriorated despots.
On June 8, 1848, Engels in an article considers the new borders of Prussia and Poland and also he writes about the Jews of Poland:
In Poland Germans and Jews make up the main part of artisans and merchants. They have created cities in the heartland of Poland ... during centuries they have contributed in all territorial developments of Poland. The Germans and Jews, who make up a very large minority, are trying to benefit from the current situation of Poland to meet their dominance. They mention first that they are German while they are not more German than US Germans. Joining them in Germany means to suppress the language and nationality of more than half of the population of Posen who are Polish.

 



Send Comment
با تشکر، نظر شما پس از بررسی و تایید در سایت قرار خواهد گرفت.
متاسفانه در برقراری ارتباط خطایی رخ داده. لطفاً دوباره تلاش کنید.