Remaining or losing - 2

The role of education in promoting chauvinist thinking
Thanks to the Zionist regime's ideological conformity, educational systems and other dominated devices of the ideology have been able to create a generation that inside them is full of selfishness, ethnic prejudice and pride as chosen race. Also within this generation, there is a kind of prejudice fever against Arabs. They know Arabs as creatures in opposition to the aspirations of Zionism. Zionist ideology has created the perception in the present generation that the only way to survive, preservation and continuation of existence is destruction of the unity of these creatures. Yashyahobn Borat, Israeli journalist, says: "I was seven years old when I was bred for outdoor military activities with the aim of occupation of Palestine as the Promised Land. According to such an approach the managers of ghetto thought in security thinking of Zionist regime used every tool to deal with other groups. In such approach wrath is a part of education in chauvinist thinking; therefore, it will be clear that upbringing in Zionist regime is a Zionist way based on violence, rape, and programming for expansion seeking and preventing other from achieving human and civil right.
According to a lawyer named "Vilytsalanfer" the Israeli policy" has focused on education of war, institutionalizing ethnic feelings and hatred toward Arabs among the students."
The political theory of legitimacy in the wars of the Zionist regime against the resistance side
The truth is a part of the chauvinist political thought. All chauvinist groups have approaches based on legitimacy. Zionist movement must be known as re-birth of thoughts based on legitimacy.
According to religious belief of Detbil, Jewish race can politically survive only by explaining their religious thoughts and security attitudes as a "political theory". Based on such approach, they can create the background of having a thought which demands a "historic right" based on "divine promise".
That is why Judaism became a principal and a base which political theory of Zionism has focused on it, and Zionist missionaries have taken advantages of it in yelling "Jewish nationality" and have introduced it as an evidence for asking "divine promise" and "ownership document" of Palestine land and as the right of return to the land for establishment of a new government and the third temple in Jerusalem. Each of such doctrines can be a necessary part of religious thinking among groups that are seeking to establish chauvinist ideas. Immanent triangle includes God, the land and the people. Legend of "chosen people" is an open invitation to the enslavement of nations and humiliating them because any distinction or choice is as imposing sovereignty and server on others. In Israel's security ontology this matter has been emphasized: "anything is permissible for those whom God has named them as chosen nation".
War, symbol of adhering "chosen people"
The idea of chosen people is considered as a part of the political ideology of the Zionist regime. This thought has been existed in different geographical areas based on ideological forms and historical interpretations of the Jews. Thought of Chosen People certainly lead to the use of violent methods because no nation can be chosen unless it usurps rights of another nation, and without violence and usurpation the possibility of returning to the "promised land" and a "Jewish state" cannot exist. After elimination of a nation to replace another nation is only carried out by force and violence. In ghetto Security ideology, violence can be considered as a complete model for stabling positioning of a country. As its first certain principal is believing that "Jewish nation" can come to existence only if there was a huge power, and the power should be armed to a weapon which can help creation of the nation and support it.
The idea of power, violence and ideology associated with political approach of many countries is considered. The idea enables the necessary infrastructure to take advantage of the option of security. According to this view, the ghetto security in the Zionist regime is based on violence. Security-oriented groups use such signs in connection with the various social groups. So far such groups to establish their own security have used violence in all areas and shapes. Including signs of violence can be actions such as killing, repression and collective action to intimidate rival groups in different geographical areas. No ideology insists on violence like Zionism does. So ghetto groups to establish their positions not only insist on the doctrines like the chosen people, but they are trying to consolidate their position through violence and use of power. Each of the groups linked to Israel's ghettos security are trying to link their secure legitimacy based on historical and ideological spirit. Ben-Gurion says in this regard: "Based on what the Bible tells us, the old history of the Zionist regime in the first place is military history of Israel state." So at the beginning of the Zionist regime's strategy, there was only a series of dreams lies in the Jewish population which refers their hard life conditions in "Ghetto" areas, but it gradually turned to a belief, and then it turned to strategic and tactic form. Ghetto security ontology has created a series of occupying and military values in Zionist regime society which has dominated all parts of the society, and it has caused all social connections of the society be formed based on a permanent feeling of worry and instability and waiting for a war rising.
War-orientation in ghetto ontology of Israel
Assessment of the behavior pattern of the Zionist regime in the region shows that war-orientation has always been one of the country's strategic imperatives. Although since the year 2006 to 2012 Zionist regime has done three preemptive wars against resistance side, historic assessment shows that since the establishment and existence of Zionist regime in 1948 the most important issue and the most certain concern of the country has been guaranteeing its survival and protecting its existence through preemptive wars.
This concern rooted in intense insecurity feeling that existed among Zionists. When Zionist regime appeared in political geographic scene of Middle East found itself among countries which mentioned it as enemy, and not only they did not agree to recognize it officially, but they wanted war and destroying it.
In 1956 a war was began that created the background of involvement of the Zionist regime with Egypt. Egypt was the front line against Israel in Jamal Abdel Nasser's era. Troops of the regime attacked Egypt along with army of France and Britain. In other words, in this war the context for oppression against radical Arab governments became prepared. 1967 war is marked as a turning point in Israel's military campaign against the Arab countries. In 1973, also another Zionist regime's military action against the Arabs was formed. 1982 war started with Israel's attack to Lebanon, and it became base of formation of the Lebanese resistance forces against the Zionist regime.
33 day war of Lebanon in 2006 is the most famous one of them. Following this war, Israel regime is going to have other preemptive wars against resistance battles in the region in 2008 and 2012. In each of these wars signs of the use of violence to destroy the rival defense structure are employed. The experience of Israel's defensive action shows that this country solely believes in the use of violence. This process shows that the Zionist regime after announcing its existence, in each of the 10 years has been engaged in a war against its neighbors in the world. In addition to the Israeli-Arab wars, the regime has sought to expand the crisis through strategic operations against other players who are in the neighboring fields. Attacks that although were not all-out war between the two countries, the Zionist regime's war against resistance side has made highly insecure conditions for Israel and its citizens. The regime has always tried to introduce the resistance as terrorist groups so that they undermine their struggle legitimacy and form the public opinion against them, but the results showed that the Zionist regime has been faced with a variety of paradox in the present era. Although the Zionist regime tends to close tactical alliance of regional states, ghetto security strategy prevents such an attitude to continue. Israel without the benefit of the strategic capabilities of countries in the region will not be able to resort to military strategy in coping with units like Iran. There are tangible signs of inability in using the territory of neighbors to rebuild and regroup in order to counter with enemy attacks. In the political and security thought of Zionist regime, guideline deterrence is considered as a function of production of power.
After Israel faced with Katyusha and Fajr-5 rockets in 2012, became more aware of its security vulnerabilities. Sensitive centers of the Zionist regime which are in the crosshairs makes the regime severely vulnerable in the event of a war. Even if all-out military attack is not done, the possibility exists for enemies of the Zionist regime to target sensitive centers of the regime. While the attacks can bring serious economic damage on the Zionist regime, they can disrupt normal, everyday life of citizens with making the region insecure.