Proving rightness of Shias

Having twenty five years experiences and taking part in over three hundred debate and scientific sessions, I believe that we should work in three pivots; otherwise, there will be any advantages. When the Friday Imam and clergymen want to speech, if they should not consider these pivots, we will be way behind in the Shiite.
The first pivot: introducing the culture of the Shiite. As Imam Reza bade (peace be upon him)
فإن الناس لو علموا محاسن كلامنا لا تبعونا
We should state firm and strong reasons related to the Quran and the narrations in order to prove the rightness of the Shiite and the innocence of Imam Ali (peace be upon him) for public (especially educated people) without prevarication and negligence.
The second pivot: we should answer doubts that they have about the beliefs of the Shiite well and clearly. For example, if I want to discuss about the reference of the guardianship verse to the guardianship of the leader of the faithful (peace be upon him), I should mention the Ghadir Hadith and answer firmly.
The third pivot: it is the pivot of invasion. During fourteen centuries, one of our mistakes was that we were always in the trench of defense and we were not in the trench of invasion. Our main purpose was not to reveal wrongs that they had and to respond their criticisms. If you refer to all of the books that were written during the history, you will understand that they are answers, defenses and rejections to books that were criticized, but there is no book that has criticized other books. Even if there had been a book that had criticized other books, it would have been noticeable. In the third pivot, if they state ten doubts against the culture of the Shiite, we should say then thousand doubts against them. In fact, the culture of their religion can have a lot of doubts and we should answer these doubts nicely and clearly from their own sources. The youths should prevent them bravely and do not let them behave impertinently. We should promote ourselves scientifically and culturally and leave the political affairs to the politicians.
At the present, the problem of Vahabiat is different from the hypocrites, Bahaeiat Vahabiat leads the Shiite youth to the stage of The thought of a youth as much as the youth fastened a belt and vest and killed himself as well as several persons. Imam Khomeini (God’s mercy be upon him) bade in the statement that he stated for the martyrs of Mecca
.‘’ Vahabiat is the promoter of Abu Sufyani and American Islam’’
The great rank of leadership (Syyed Ali Khamenei, the current leader of Iran,) bade in his speech and emphasized several times
''We should not avoid any try in relation to Vahabiat, we should introduce them to people and state their malicious culture to people''.
Of course, at the present, I did not get surprised about the great rank of leadership’s interpretation (Syyed Ali Khamenei, the current leader of Iran,) regarding the cooperation of Iran with Arab and other countries. When he sees that no one shows reaction against Vahabiat, he has to act in this way and to endanger himself toward Vahabiat.
At the present, the enemies of Islam have come to fight with all of their abilities and they are trying to make discord among the Islamic scientists, Shiite and Sunni supporters since they know that they cannot have any power in the Islamic countries with the existence of unity between the Sunni and Shiite supporters.
The enemies of the Islam do not care about whether they confront with the Sunnite or the Shiite, but at the present, Islam is the factor of threat for them and it can endanger their benefits. One of the conspicuous personalities of the white palace and the theorists, Dr Hantington, has introduced different plans in order to make discord between the Shiite and the Sunni supporters in the Middle East and he has suggested different solutions in the book ‘’ the reaction of the civilizations’’. It has been clearly stated in this book
''If America wants to succeed with relying on the military power, it will be impossible. The time of relying on spearheads, canon, tank, machine gun and bomb has been passed and at the present, America should deal with cultural invasion and civilization. If America wants to succeed in the Middle East, it should eradicate the civilizations one after another and no civilization can remain in the Middle East except the liberal civilization of America''.
He surveys the civilizations and he does not consider the Yahudi, Christianity, Buda and Indi civilizations that can put up America and Islam is only culture that is dangerous for America and they should think deeply and invest in relation to this culture. Then he suggests some solutions to eradicate the Islamic culture from the society such as: leading the youth to corruption, creating disagreement among the Muslims and among the religions of the Shiite and the Sunnite and other plans.
It is said that America has appeared in the Middle East because it wants to follow Dr Hantington‘s suggested plan.
If you pay attention to Iraq and Afghanistan countries, you will know that both the Sunni people and the Shiite people were killed with the same weapons and the bullets and they are no difference for the enemies. The explosions of Iran and Iraq have had the victims of both the Shiite and Sunni people. In our country, some of the Sunni scientists were killed in these explosions in Sistan Va Balujestan. Hence, we should be alert and careful enough not to perform the plan of the enemy in the Middle East intentionally and unintentionally. In martyr Motahari’s interpretation (may God’s mercy be upon him).
Unity between the Shiite and Sunni nations is one of essentials in the Islam world.
People (whether Shiite or Sunni) that do some actions to disintegrate unity between the Shiite and Sunni nations have the worst betrayal for the Islam world.
I have said over and over again in the Salam Channel (I had this program for four years)
I said in the meeting that I had with Molavi Ahmad Narui (he is from Afghanistan originally and he the temporary Friday Imam of Zahedanm), Molavi Abd al-Majid Morad Zehi and some other scholars.
I had a live program in the martyrdom days of Imam Bagher (peace be upon him) and Imam Sadegh (peace be upon him) in the channel three and I said this interpretation there. Even I recited a narration from Kafi and the narrator asks from Imam Sadegh (peace be upon him)
كیف ینبغی لنا أن نصنع فیما بیننا و بین قومنا و بین خلطائنا من الناس ممن لیسوا على أمرنا؟ قال: تنظرون إلى أئمتكم الذین تقتدون بهم، فتصنعون ما یصنعون، فوالله! إنهم لیعودون مرضاهم و یشهدون جنائزهم و یقیمون الشهادة لهم و علیهم و یؤدون الأمانة إلیهم
How should we behave with persons that are against the Sunnite? He bade '' see how your leader and Imams behave with them and you behave as they behave with them. I swear God that they visit their sick people and take part in their funeral ceremonies and they attest in their advantage and disadvantage and give back what they give for safekeeping''.
He said ‘’ you should not have said these narrations at the present’’. What should I have said? I should have told ‘’O’ people! Abuse and insult the Sunni nation’’. The Imams have been our pattern in the life. Give me an example that Imam Bagher (peace be upon him) or Imam Sadegh (peace be upon him) insulted to the Sunni nation and their holy things in the pulpits. You are usually in your houses and you do not have enough information about all over the world. But we are almost in touch with all over the world by means of the institute and the Internet and we travel different countries and the Shiite and Sunni people communicate with us. We should understand that your chances have been lost to hold meetings in Mashhad, Qom, and Tabriz and …and to say whatever you like the same last years. Even if you express sentences in these matters, when you talk on the phone in your house, they will be published in all over the world tomorrow. You should not do things that create any disagreement, discord and struggle in other countries. As you do not like that others insult to your holy thins and Imams, the Sunni people consider respect for their leaders and it will not tolerable for them, if a person acts impertinently toward them. If you have scientific reasons and remarks, please express them. The Sunni people also express scientific remarks and there is no limit in expressing scientific remarks because they deal with sense and logic not with feelings and emotions. One of our main duties, the Sunni and Shiite scholars, is stand against the extremists and this is only way out for us. If there are few Shiite and Sunni extremists or radicals, they will fire and make a fuss in the Islamic society.
We should be alert enough to prevent these extremists. If any extremes be done by the Shiite or Sunnite, it will be in the favor of our religion and world. If we do not like our religion and we want to have a flourishing world, these disagreements will run riot the world of the Shiite and the Sunnite. We thank God that all of the officials have tried to move toward unity and they have been able to prevent many extremists and radicals with the bliss of the martyrs’ blood and Imam Khomeini (may God’s mercy be upon him) during thirty years although they have not done well, we have done some minor mistakes and have committed some sins.
One scientist in Qom has written a book and he has insulted to the holy things of the Sunnite in the book. He was captured and defrocked and on the face of it, he is at the jail now. Of course, we had a lot of confrontations in such cases. Because one of the young clergymen had written a book and published it illegally, he was captured and defrocked and he was also prohibited from giving sermons. The Islamic republic system reacts harshly in these kinds of actions against the Sunnite. If you go to courts related to clergymen, you will understand that the judiciary branch of Iran reacts harshly to the radical scientists that behave against the Sunnite (whether in their sermons or books). However, unfortunately, because two radical clergy men of the Sunnite were arrested, all of radical clergy men of the Sunnite protested and they announced on the satellite that such and such clergy men were arrested. But the Sunni clergymen do not about the Shiite clergy men are arrested. The Islamic republic system behaves frankly in such cases.
I have relationship with the Sunni scientists in the country and they come to my house and they are served for dinner and lunch such as Mr. Molavi Morad Zehi, deceased Sheikh Ali Dehvari and others. Even I go to the Sunni scientists’ house and all of my family members have relationship with the family members of the scientists in Golestan. At the present, there are about thirty thousand book s in my library and about twelve thousand books are the Sunni ones.
We are trying to do whatever is good for the Islam world, but we do not avoid telling our realities. We express our reasons with the Shiite beliefs and trends and we request the Sunni scientists to express their remarks with reasons.
Unity among Iranian people was the second secret of our success. All of the people (Shiite, Sunni or Christian) were and will be in a line in all of the demonstrations, in the time of the king, after the king and in the front and will be in a line. It was not in a way that the Shiite and Sunni people demonstrate separately.