What is the Idea of Professors about the Jewish believes?

Professor, "Othman Said al-Ani" has said in his research that the oldest version obtained from the "Old Testament" is a version of the famous "halo Qumran", so he adds in this subject that: the version of the Old Testament is not fully compatible with all letter and content of the current "Old Testament", but it seems a lot of information is lessened from it, so many of the "journeys" are incomplete. About the time of this discovered edition, there is disputation among historians and version sociologists, for example, US' researcher "Albert" says that this version returns to 2,000 years before Christ (Peace be upon him), while others including Italian researcher "Daryfer" believes that this version belongs to the period after the Islamic conquests, and in short, in the meantime, there are many other ideas!
Of course, Professor, "Osman Sad al-Ani" criticizes and doubts about the old version of the so-called discovery that how is it possible to accept this very long distance, which means that since the time that the Torah was revealed to Moses (peace be upon him) until then the older version of the "Qumran" was achieved in the cave? How can this gap be adapted with two above opinions of (American Albert and Italian Daryfer)? Accordingly professor "al-Ani" says: If we accept the first theory that says this version of the Torah dates back to 2000 BC, therefore, time difference between this version and the time of Prophet Moses (Peace be upon him) that in principle is the owner of the Torah will be less than 1,000 years, as well as 700 years between it and the Prophet Solomon (Peace be upon him) that is the manufacturer of the temple.
So we will ask if we really can trust the text called "the Old Testament ". And could it prove "historical right" of the Jews in Palestine and Al-Aqsa Mosque? And can the Old Testament be as a historical, credible, and acceptable source to noble historians and researchers?
Then Mr. "Lany" writes that: We do not know it far that the idea of "temple" may be taken from idolatry religions because the word "temple" in terms of words is taken from Kanaan "Hikal" word and the proper way to worship and praise in Jewish temples is similar to method of worship in the old Babylon temple (Zaqr) and the Canaanites temple as far as French researcher, "Andariyeh Barrow", specializing in search of the early history of the Torah, stresses the similarity and convergence!
At the end, Master "al-Ani," makes his words brief and says about the "Old Testament" that this word is not the word of God and does not show God's religion, but most of its texts and phrases are pagane and there is in no way that it represents the true worship of God of the universe.
Allah Almighty says in the Holy Qur'an: "Verily, some of the people of the book [Jews and others] are a people that turn their language when reading the scripture, so that you may think that it can be the book of Allah and is not distorted, while that scripture is not from God, while never not from God, then they attribute lies and slander to God."
Now aggressor Zionists are looking for "Solomon's Temple" below the base of the shrine of Abraham and dig deep tunnels with the same excuse under the walls, but the mosque Al-Aqsa was built by Prophet Abraham (Peace be upon him), while the "temple" was made by Solomon according to Jewish claims, and there are about 1000 years between these two prophets (Abraham and Solomon (peace be upon them)). So "shrine" was prior to "temple" and presence of Islam in it has a longer history than the Jews, therefore, it must be asked how it is possible that "Solomon's Temple" is created under the "harem" after 1000 years of building “Ibrahimi Haram", while "harem" has been in place? How can Jews persist against all the historical constants and irrefutable outright truths which reveal their false claims and deception?
The results of the excavations of Zionists in Palestine
Start of Jews' excavations around the Al-Aqsa Mosque was in late 1967 C.E., and these soil removing have ever been conducted in 9 steps. Excavations' financial costs have been accepted by "the Hebrew University and archaeological team worked under supervision of Professor Benjamin Frad and his assistant" Meirdof ". The excavations have been done under several walls of Ibrahimi Haram, in different ways, and with different sizes, ranging from 80 to 400 meters in length and to a depth of 10 to 20 meters, but what was obtained in the excavations all belonged to the Islamic monuments ( Umayyad period) and Roman and Byzantine artifacts. While in another place, they faced three Umayyad palaces which two of them were identical to each other, and the third one was a little different with two others. However, the Zionists not only has not found any trace of the "temple" in these exploratory, archaeological excavations, but mentioned excavations have been a danger so that the risk to the walls of the mosque and Islamic monuments and works of Islamic civilization to be cracked and crumbled, so actually the wall around the mosque (Sur) and Al-Aqsa Mosque are at risk of failure and loss, because their structures are very old, and on the other hand excavation around pillars and walls out to great depths, in addition to weather factors and the problem of erosion, are great threat of total destruction of Al-Aqsa mosque!
Researcher Miss "Grysen Halsell", met the city of Jerusalem in 1983, and interviewed the famous American archaeologist "Gordon Franz" who was staying in Palestine for two years (at the College of the Holy Land) and excavated. Incidentally, at the same time, there was a sculpture of "Solomon's Temple" in front of him and Miss "Halsell" asked him: "Is there really clear signs that this" temple" is in the place where now its designer has put it in this "replica"; that is where the Al-Aqsa mosque and the "dome of the Rock" is located? Archaeologist "Franz" said: no evidence has been found that "Solomon's Temple" has been placed there or it has not been at that location, but some people think that "temple" has been in the same place!
Furthermore, the Jewish designer of replica of Solomon's Temple, "Iggy Yunah", says: There are various hypotheses about the location and actual position of "temple"; therefore, no one exactly knows its place! The same lady researcher, "Grysen Halsell" says: I asked Mr. "Iggy Yunah" finally, where is the location of the "Temple" in 2,000 years ago? Jewish replica designer "Yunah" replied: "I do not know and nobody else knows; everything we know is that they [Israeli authorities] say to us: we want the" temple "!
But in fact, they primarily want to destroy the Al-Aqsa Mosque, and yet I do not know how they will ruin the mosque, but it will happen."
Now, if we assume the debate that "Solomon's Temple" as in thoughts of Jews exists, then we ask its history, the answer to this would be that essentially the "temple" does not exist in the Palestinian Territories; as the temple that the [distorted] Torah has made it in the Jewish minds has been subject to looting, destruction, fire and destruction of successive governments that ruled in Palestine for several times, as far as its roots and its foundations were pulled from the ground and instead it, people have planted wheat and barley. So now the claim Temple does not exist on the map of the Holy Land of Palestine and there is no trace of archaeological evidence for this claim.
Even if we hypothetically accept that there is a temple in Palestine that Solomon (peace be upon him) made it according to Jews and Zionists' claim, this is the possibility of maximum of temple, or a mosque as Muslims say in which they must worship and obey God and his oneness because the Prophet Solomon (peace be upon him) built the temple to solitude with his God in it and to get closer to God by prayer, invocation, and thanks to the divine realm; not that Solomon made the temple to create difference in the racial, religious, ethnic issues, and even to relive the glory of the Jews, who claim that are God's chosen people!
Of course book of the "Old Testament" of the Jews uncovers a very controversial and shocking plan and that is this the mother of Solomon (peace be upon him) is not Jewish in descent and origin and race? At this point, Mr. "Osman Saeed Al-Ani" narrates the impression from the continue of his study of Torah that: even if the Prophet Solomon (Peace be upon him) was already in our age could not get a Jewish birth certificate as his mother is not Jewish; Therefore, even if he wrote a request to the government of "Sharon" to demand proving his lineage, the State of Israel would not have recognized him as Jewish based on their law of Judaism, even if he is Producer and architect of the "temple" as he basically is not a Jew in sight of Zionists. So why do Jews and Zionists are looking for Al-Aqsa Mosque? And why do they insist to build their claim "temple" there, while its manufacturer according to their own opinion is not really Jewish? So I say to the Jews: "If your house is made of glass, so you do not throw stones!"
Legitimization of behavior and specifying the purpose for the Jews
Basically, the Jews' movement in the political and strategic activities are based on the basis of "The aim justifies the means"; as Zionists have determined the goal as establishing a "Hebrew Jewish state", which is according to the Torah' idea; it means that the policy of the Israeli regime is based on domination, aggression and occupation, and it gradually implemented a pre-designed plan that may not be scheduled based on a specific plan, as far as the plan and the map can become a military or economic stage, and also these colonial plans can be used in any manner and by any tools and give it practical dimension. With this title that it is the conduct and character based of manner of "prophets of Israel" because according to the Bible, they simply commit usury and fornication and use vulgar remarks in their language, and impose war, murder and looting people and genocide, violence, assassinations to all nations. Hence, Jews and Zionists legitimize their criminal acts and criminal actions!