Israel's nuclear policy In the Middle East

Ehud Barack, who was prime minister during Peres government, said on December 29, 1995 at a Labor party meeting, Israel's nuclear policy will not change not now neither in the future because of the dangers threatening the Israeli fate and future generation. He explained that Israel's nuclear policy is one of the main pillars of the government, which originates in the government's responsibility towards the citizens, and emphasized that such a policy "will not change nor there is a possibility of change," and Barak once again added the significance of the nuclear weapons program Israel while speaking on January 18, 1996, on the strength of the Israeli armed forces and its supranational factors: "One of these factors of supremacy is the fear that the Arab world's leaders and nations are afraid of Israel's nuclear capability." When Benjamin Netanyahu was the prime minister of Israel, he was facing nuclear issues. "Even if Syria, Iran, Iraq, and Libya are ready to sign an agreement on peace, in order to eliminate unconventional weapons such as nuclear, chemical and microbial weapons, I will oppose the signing of such treaties," he said during a conversation with Radio Israel on January 26, 1996. ". "In a Danish television interview on May 2, 1998, Shimon Peres pointed to the issue of Israeli nuclear weapons and said:" We have never announced that we have a nuclear weapon; we will not be the first country to enter Nuclear weapons into the Middle East region. They have already informed me that the Egyptian Foreign Minister has requested a visit to Dimona, if they go there, they will not find anything. "Here, according to Egyptian Foreign Minister, Omar Moussa' proposal in February 1995, Egyptian officials and experts visited the Damuna Power Plant."In this case, their fear will collapse, and our deterrence will disappear, I mean, their doubt is a deterrent to us," Peres adds. "When it came to having a nuclear weapon, Peres answered: "It was really necessary for us to have a nuclear plant to reach peace,". If we did not start a nuclear strategy in Dimona 40 years ago, we would never have been able to bring peace to the area in Oslo. "Peres later denied any confirmation of the existence of nuclear weapons, and said:" Israel has never officially announced that it has bombs "At the same time, however, Peres spoke a bit later as if it was the first Israeli official confession to have a nuclear weapon. In a conversation with Israel's Second Television Network on June 5, 1998, said in response to the question "why the Dimona nuclear power plant was built": "At that time, we hoped that these Israeli power plants would help bring peace talks to neighboring Arab countries, "At that time, I think we were thinking of Oslo, not Hiroshima," he continued.” No one makes nuclear bomb to use it, we are only looking for a deterrent nuclear force to prevent a war. "Shimon Peres repeated these statements at the press conference held on July 13, 1998 in Amman. Based on what the Mawari newspaper wrote, Peres said: "We did not create our own nuclear option to go to Hiroshima, but we wanted to go to Oslo." There are conflicts about deterrence based on doubt on the real Israeli nuclear power and whether the nuclear power plant Demona has been established solely for peaceful purposes, and denial of any kind of nuclear weapons in that country, while emphasizing that it has ability to actually build a nuclear weapon whenever they feel other countries have entered nuclear weapons into Middle East. Indeed, it helps the national security of the Zionist regime in a number of different ways because such a conflict, on the one hand, would create an active deterrence against the Arab governments and the military's attitudes towards this regimes, and on the other hand, given Israel's fear of a nuclear threat from Iran, now it would have nuclear weapon Or to boost Bushehr's nuclear power plant in a quantitative and qualitative manner, has led Israel's attention to the emphasis on nuclear weapons as a deterrent across the Middle East. Of course, the United States seems to share a deal with Israel. In this regard, Ehud Barak stated on December 27, 1995: "Iran will acquire a primary nuclear bomb in 2001 after recruiting experts from the former Soviet republics." The term "primary bomb" or "heavy bomb" as some people call it, is a bomb that is relatively large in terms of its explosive force and is relatively similar to the first nuclear bombs that were used against Hiroshima and Nagasaki at a time when nuclear bomber technology was at the top of the way." From Barack's statements we can understand that Israel's nuclear technology has undergone its initial stages. Given that the removal of any use of nuclear technology by Israel is due to the establishment of a comprehensive and complete peace in the Middle East with the presence of Iran, Iraq and Libya, as Shimon Peres said, and Iran will also acquire a nuclear bomb in 2001, as Barack says, and with regard to the ideology and political situation of Iran, at least at the present time, it does not seem to be in line with other Arabs to have a full peace with the Zionist regime, so Israel will never miss its nuclear option even in the distant future. This regime using threat of power of making nuclear weapons without acknowledging that it has the weapons has succeeded to build the most advanced weapons and gained the upper hand in the arms race from Arab countries. The United States provided the best weapons to Israel, either before or after the 1973 war, on the basis of Israel's threat and in order to prevent starting a nuclear weapons race in the region from. Zionist policies and US aid became more apparent after the first F-4 phantoms were sold to Israel in 1968, and in 1974 and 1978, when the United States agreed that the F-15s and F-16s, and the "Lance" land-based missiles be given to Israel. Meanwhile, during the Persian Gulf War in 1991, the United States provided Israel with anti-missile patriot missiles, and so far, all types of missiles and advanced weapons are being handed over to Israel. At the same time, the United States has concluded several agreements on strategic cooperation since the early eighties and several military alliances between the two countries due to the pretexts of Israel. It should not be forgotten that the official announcement of the existence of nuclear weapons in Israel would never be in favor of US policy in the region, since such a declaration would have a completely negative effect on US policies that asks Arab states not to seek nuclear weapons. And basically, as it is clear, the severe sanctions imposed on Iraq after the Persian Gulf War was due to the country's acquisition of nuclear weapons. But, surprisingly, not only there was no pressure on Israel to sign the Non-Proliferation Treaty, which was adopted on the eve of May 12, 1995, but also it has been supported for the prevention of joining the treaty. For example, US Assistant Secretary of State for Middle East Affairs, Robert Platerau, on January 21, 1995 in Cairo, said: "It is never possible to compare the situation of Egypt and Israel in terms of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty because Egypt is not threatened by any country in the world, which is why there is no need for a nuclear weapon for Egypt, while Israel is threatened by the entire Arab world, and because of this, after establishment of peace in the region, it will be able to sign this pact. "Neutron bombs are tiny hydrogen bombs that instead of breakdown of the atomic nucleus in them a kind of unification and composition of atomic nuclei creates in them. These bombs after explosion activate 80 percent of their energy in the form of active neutrons that passes through the mass of objects such as tanks and buildings, and the remaining 20 percent is for explosive force. If the bomb explodes at 450 meters above the ground, only the neutron remains, and the rays from it will not pollute the soil outside the area of the explosion. These warheads cripple people within five minutes after the explosion and they are dead within 24 hours, and those who are located at a 15-kilometer radius of neutron explosion or who are themselves suffering from severe illness or whose children who are born later suffer from such complications.